Re: [Btrfs-devel] btrfs without acl

2008-08-12 Thread Chris Mason
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 11:40 +0200, Christian Hesse wrote: Hello everyone, trying to build btrfs-0.16 without acl support (CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL unset) results in the following error messages for me: fs/built-in.o: In function `btrfs_permission': inode.c:(.text+0x61250): undefined reference

[PATCH 3/3] Implement our own copy of the nfsd readdir hack, for older kernels

2008-08-12 Thread David Woodhouse
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- inode.c | 104 +- 1 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/inode.c b/inode.c index 5344526..faa5543 100644 --- a/inode.c +++ b/inode.c @@ -1956,7 +1956,8 @@

btrfsLabel Patches

2008-08-12 Thread Morey Roof
Here is everything for the btrfslabel patches together. Let me know if anything needs to be changed to get it merged. Thanks, Morey This part is for the progs-unstable tree: --- diff -r da35ab2b0b54 Makefile --- a/Makefile Wed Aug 06 12:17:01

[PATCH] compile when posix acl's are disabled

2008-08-12 Thread Josef Bacik
Hello, This patch makes btrfs so it will compile properly when acls are disabled. I tested this and it worked with CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL off and on. Thanks much, Josef diff -r 447f15493ff8 Makefile --- a/Makefile Thu Aug 07 11:19:43 2008 -0400 +++ b/Makefile Tue Aug 12 17:23:53 2008 -0400 @@

Re: [PATCH] compile when posix acl's are disabled

2008-08-12 Thread Christian Hesse
On Tuesday 12 August 2008, Josef Bacik wrote: Hello, This patch makes btrfs so it will compile properly when acls are disabled. I tested this and it worked with CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL off and on. Thanks much, Works perfectly. Thanks a lot! -- Regards, Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH 2/3] NFS support for btrfs - v2

2008-08-12 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:46:46PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: +static inline struct dentry *d_obtain_alias(struct inode *inode) +{ + struct dentry *d = d_alloc_anon(inode); + if (!d) + iput(inode); + return d; +} +#endif I'm not sure when al wants to merge with

Question

2008-08-12 Thread Morey Roof
I was wondering if someone could give me a few hints. I noticed that all patches have [PATCH] in the subject. Should this always be done? Also, any other general rules to follow that could be passed on would be nice. Thanks, Morey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

[PATCH] kernel-unstable: Adds label manipulate ioctl

2008-08-12 Thread Morey Roof
This patch adds two IOCTLs to allow for changing of the label with the file system mounted. Signed-off-by: Morey Roof [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff -r 447f15493ff8 ioctl.c --- a/ioctl.c Thu Aug 07 11:19:43 2008 -0400 +++ b/ioctl.c Tue Aug 12 15:07:03 2008 -0600 @@ -749,6 +749,53 @@