On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:55:49AM -0700, Erik Jensen wrote:
So, I ended up just applying the relevant commit to my existing source
tree, which did allow me to successfully remove the missing drive, so
I seem to be back up and running.
Thank you very much!
Fantastic, thanks for letting us
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:37:06PM +1100, William Uther wrote:
Hi,
I have a raid1 setup with a missing device. I have added a new device and
everything seems to be working fine, except I cannot remove the old, missing,
device. There is no error - but the 'some devices missing' tag
it's very slow in installtion with apt in ubuntu
--
Abdullah Ansari ahe...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi everybody,
Today while playing around with btrfs I uncovered what must be a bug in the
btrfs checksum code. My kernel log received a couple of these messages with
various ino and off numbers:
btrfs csum failed ino 5098 off 524288 csum 2981133980 private 959545494
[..]
This happens on
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
I've used for some days btrfs-progs-20100717, now I'm using btrfs-
progs-201030 (built with the SlackBuild script for slackware).
Works fine, but the actual version works in another way than the
previous when I say
mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb1
(or how the device may be
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
I've tried to convert a 12 GByte ext2 partition (nearly full, 280 MByte
free) with btrfs-convert.
After about 15 minutes (700-MHz-CPU) the system tells
...
creating ext2fs image file
cleaning up system chunk
btrfs-convert: extent-tree.c:2529: btrfs_reserve_extent:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 03:30 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
I use btrfs on most of my volumes on my laptop, and I've always felt
booting was very slow, but definitely sure is slow, is starting up
Google Chrome:
Today while playing around with btrfs I uncovered what must be a bug in the
btrfs checksum code. My kernel log received a couple of these messages with
various ino and off numbers:
btrfs csum failed ino 5098 off 524288 csum 2981133980 private 959545494
[..]
This happens on reading from
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 03:30 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
I use btrfs on most of my volumes on my laptop, and I've always felt
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 12:36:58AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:25 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
btrfs fi defrag isn't recursive. btrfs filesystem defrag /home will
defragment the space used to store the folder, without touching the
space used to store
Thanks to Chris and Brian for the help!
On 31/10/2010, at 11:01 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:37:06PM +1100, William Uther wrote:
[snip - issues removing a missing drive - see below for new log]
Is this actually a problem, or can I just keep running as is? It seems to
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
I've tried to convert a 12 GByte ext2 partition (nearly full, 280 MByte
free) with btrfs-convert.
After about 15 minutes (700-MHz-CPU) the system tells
...
creating ext2fs image file
cleaning
12 matches
Mail list logo
