CC [M] fs/btrfs/ctree.o
In file included from fs/btrfs/ctree.c:21:0:
fs/btrfs/ctree.h:1003:17: error: field 91super_kobj92 has incomplete type
fs/btrfs/ctree.h:1074:17: error: field 91root_kobj92 has incomplete type
make[2]: *** [fs/btrfs/ctree.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/btrfs] Error 2
make:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:30:07PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:13:42PM -0500, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
IOWs, all they want to do is avoid the unwritten extent conversion
overhead. Time has shown that a bad security/performance tradeoff
decision was made 13 years
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:13:42PM -0500, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
The historical reason for such behaviour existing in XFS was that in
1997 the CPU and IO latency cost of unwritten extent conversion was
significant,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 06:07:15PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Josef has implemented mixed data/metadata chunks, we must add those chunks'
space just like data chunks.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
Thanks,
Josef
---
fs/btrfs/super.c |
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 06:07:24PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
There are two tiny problem:
- One is When we check the chunk size is greater than the max chunk size or
not,
we should take mirrors into account, but the original code didn't.
- The other is btrfs shouldn't use the size of the
I've had a go at determining exactly what happens when you create a
filesystem without enough devices to meet the requested replication
strategy:
# mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/vdb
# mount /dev/vdb /mnt
# btrfs fi df /mnt
Data: total=8.00MB, used=0.00
System, DUP: total=8.00MB,
E.g. btrfsctl -r -4000m /dev/sda5
results in:
ioctl:: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10
Kernel: 2.6.35-22-generic
According to the Synaptic Package manager, the version of btrfs-tools is
0.19+20100601-3
Other information that can be of interest:
- I started Ubuntu on a
On 12 January 2011 18:45, Mikael Andersson mik...@develog.se wrote:
E.g. btrfsctl -r -4000m /dev/sda5
Hey Mikael,
btrfsctl is deprecated, you should use btrfs
In the previous example:
btrfs filesystem resize -4000m /dev/sda5
Check the help of btrfs
And also good to download latest btrfs-progs
On 12/01/11 14:02, Hugo Mills wrote:
I've had a go at determining exactly what happens when you create a
filesystem without enough devices to meet the requested replication
strategy:
Thanks - being new to this I haven't set up the infrastructure to try
these tests - but am interested
If we run low on space we could get a bunch of warnings out of
btrfs_block_rsv_check, but this is mostly just called via the transaction code
to see if we need to end the transaction, it expects to see failures, so let's
not WARN and freak everybody out for no reason. Thanks,
Signed-off-by:
10 matches
Mail list logo