The code path should not reach there. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui shh...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 0639a55..c1be2da 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++
The bitfield member mount_opt was too small by one bit to hold the mount
option that enabled to include data extents in the integrity checker.
Since the same issue happened when the BTRFS_MOUNT_PANIC_ON_FATAL_ERROR
option was added (git rebase silently merges so that the increase of the
size of
Each CRC or header error was counted twice, this is now fixed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens sbehr...@giantdisaster.de
---
The patch is based on cmason/integration as of 3/30/2012.
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 15 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Friday 2012-03-30 17:13, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Attempting to run `df` on a read-only btrfs crashes the kernel:
# losetup -r -o $[313344*512] /dev/loop4 wholedisk.img
# mount -o ro /dev/loop4 /mnt
device fsid 4ba1fa38-d62b-4940-9825-7e6cceb7fcc8 devid 1 transid 4333
/dev/loop4
# df
Change the direct_IO aop to take an iov_iter argument rather than an iovec.
This will get passed down through most filesystems so that only the
__blockdev_direct_IO helper need be aware of whether user or kernel memory
is being passed to the function.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp
btrfs can use generic_file_read_iter(). Base btrfs_file_write_iter()
on btrfs_file_aio_write(), then have the latter call the former.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com
Cc: Zach Brown z...@zabbo.net
Cc: Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
---
Hello Ilya,
Ilya Dryomov wrote (ao):
I'm definitely intrested in reproducing it. Could you please umount this
filesystem, capture the output of 'btrfs-debug-tree -d dev' and post it
somewhere ?
Will do. It is the / filesystem, so I'll need to reboot.
I need this to confirm that
Hi everyone,
This pull request is pretty big, picking up patches that have been under
development for some time. I have it in two branches:
# against 3.3
#
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git for-linus
# merged with linus git as of this morning (conflict in
Le 22/02/2012 17:55, Olivier Bonvalet a écrit :
So, the btrfs-convert for the smaller drive is done... after near 5 days. Which
stats can I give you ?
It's a 340GB LVM block device, and btrfs filesystem df /backup/ say that :
Data: total=225.97GB, used=181.94GB
System: total=32.00MB,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git for-linus
This causes a new warning for me:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function ‘repair_eb_io_failure’:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1940:6: warning: ‘ret’
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:49:56PM +0200, Sander wrote:
Hello Ilya,
Ilya Dryomov wrote (ao):
I'm definitely intrested in reproducing it. Could you please umount this
filesystem, capture the output of 'btrfs-debug-tree -d dev' and post
it
somewhere ?
Will do. It is the /
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
This causes a new warning for me:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function ‘repair_eb_io_failure’:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1940:6: warning: ‘ret’ may be used
uninitialized in this function
Hmm?
Ok, so presumably
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:50:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git
for-linus
This causes a new warning for me:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:54:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
This causes a new warning for me:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function ‘repair_eb_io_failure’:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1940:6: warning:
Chris Mason chris.mason at oracle.com writes:
Hi everyone,
This pull request is pretty big, picking up patches that have been under
development for some time. I have it in two branches:
Thank you all guys for your time, effort and responses here.
No problems here so far ;-)
--
To
On 30/03/2012, at 2:22 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:08 AM, member graysky gray...@archlinux.us wrote:
Are there plans to integrate btrfsck with the userlevel API for fsck?
There isn't even a stable, working, fixing btrfsck yet :)
Yes, there is. Chris merged the
Ilya Dryomov wrote (ao):
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:49:56PM +0200, Sander wrote:
Thanks. btrfs-debug-tree confirms that you've got a balance item on
media.
After that mount it back and see if there is btrfs: continuing
balance line in dmesg (and if btrfs-balance kthread shows up)?
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Avi Miller avi.mil...@oracle.com wrote:
On 30/03/2012, at 2:22 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:08 AM, member graysky gray...@archlinux.us wrote:
Are there plans to integrate btrfsck with the userlevel API for fsck?
There isn't even a
18 matches
Mail list logo
