On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:21 AM David Sterba wrote:
> They IMHO qualify for a late rc, though I did not expect that many.
Especially with the tree-log.c changes being fairly big, I took a look, and
I have to say that I appreciate (a) the warning in the pull request and (b)
the
Hi,
we've accumulated some fixes during the last week, some of them were in
the works for a longer time but there are some newer ones too. Most of
the fixes have a reproducer and fix user visible problems, also
candidates for stable kernels. They IMHO qualify for a late rc, though I
did not