Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes:
Add a new rw_semaphore to protect bmap against truncate. Previous
i_alloc_sem was abused for this, but it's going away in this series.
In FAT case, -i_mutex was better. But, last time I saw, shmfs was using
-i_mutex to call -bmap. So, this was
OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp writes:
Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes:
Add a new rw_semaphore to protect bmap against truncate. Previous
i_alloc_sem was abused for this, but it's going away in this series.
In FAT case, -i_mutex was better. But, last time I saw,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:57:43AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes:
Add a new rw_semaphore to protect bmap against truncate. Previous
i_alloc_sem was abused for this, but it's going away in this series.
In FAT case, -i_mutex was better. But, last
Add a new rw_semaphore to protect bmap against truncate. Previous
i_alloc_sem was abused for this, but it's going away in this series.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Index: linux-2.6/fs/fat/inode.c
===
---
