On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On Monday, 01 November, 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On Saturday, 30 October, 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
This is identical to 'snapshot', but uses the new async snapshot
creation
ioctl, and prints
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On Saturday, 30 October, 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
This is identical to 'snapshot', but uses the new async snapshot creation
ioctl, and prints out the transid the new snapshot will be committed
with.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil
This is identical to 'snapshot', but uses the new async snapshot creation
ioctl, and prints out the transid the new snapshot will be committed
with.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
---
btrfs.c |8 +++-
btrfs_cmds.c | 32 +++-
btrfs_cmds.h |
On Saturday, 30 October, 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
This is identical to 'snapshot', but uses the new async snapshot creation
ioctl, and prints out the transid the new snapshot will be committed
with.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
---
btrfs.c |8 +++-
btrfs_cmds.c |
On Saturday, 30 October, 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
This is identical to 'snapshot', but uses the new async snapshot creation
ioctl, and prints out the transid the new snapshot will be committed
with.
Only for curiosity, how long may take snapshot a tree ? It should be only a
copy and update of
