Is this not a valid patch/fix ? Who do I have to bug to get this merged :)
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Ahmed Kamal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's probably a more proper patch
>
> # HG changeset patch
> # Signed-Off-By: Ahmed Kamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # Date 1216410189 -10800
> # Node ID f35e2b3b25a97d42452ec90b6c524721d9c9941f
> # Parent 1aa4b32e3efd452531cb0b883edfcc3761487fca
> Fixing btrfsctl argument handling
>
> diff -r 1aa4b32e3efd -r f35e2b3b25a9 btrfsctl.c
> --- a/btrfsctl.c Tue Jun 10 10:09:18 2008 -0400
> +++ b/btrfsctl.c Fri Jul 18 22:43:09 2008 +0300
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
> btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
> exit(0);
> }
> - for (i = 1; i < ac - 1; i++) {
> + for (i = 1; i <= ac - 1; i++) {
> if (strcmp(av[i], "-s") == 0) {
> if (i + 1 >= ac - 1) {
> fprintf(stderr, "-s requires an arg");
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Ahmed Kamal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > btrfsctl -A
> > in the current -unstable branch, does not result in the error message
> > designated for it, namely "-A requires an arg\n". Turns out the whole
> > loop was being skipped!
> > Please find a patch attached that fixed it for me.
> >
> > diff -r 1aa4b32e3efd btrfsctl.c
> > --- a/btrfsctl.c Tue Jun 10 10:09:18 2008 -0400
> > +++ b/btrfsctl.c Fri Jul 18 22:34:46 2008 +0300
> > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
> > btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
> > exit(0);
> > }
> > - for (i = 1; i < ac - 1; i++) {
> > + for (i = 1; i <= ac - 1; i++) {
> > if (strcmp(av[i], "-s") == 0) {
> > if (i + 1 >= ac - 1) {
> > fprintf(stderr, "-s requires an arg");
> >
> >
> > PS: Is this the correct way to submit patches ?
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
