Re: Understanding BTRFS RAID0 Performance

2018-10-08 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2018-10-05 20:34, Duncan wrote: Wilson, Ellis posted on Fri, 05 Oct 2018 15:29:52 + as excerpted: Is there any tuning in BTRFS that limits the number of outstanding reads at a time to a small single-digit number, or something else that could be behind small queue depths? I can't

Re: Understanding BTRFS RAID0 Performance

2018-10-05 Thread Duncan
Wilson, Ellis posted on Fri, 05 Oct 2018 15:29:52 + as excerpted: > Is there any tuning in BTRFS that limits the number of outstanding reads > at a time to a small single-digit number, or something else that could > be behind small queue depths? I can't otherwise imagine what the >

Re: Understanding BTRFS RAID0 Performance

2018-10-05 Thread Wilson, Ellis
On 10/05/2018 06:40 AM, Duncan wrote: > Wilson, Ellis posted on Thu, 04 Oct 2018 21:33:29 + as excerpted: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm attempting to understand a roughly 30% degradation in BTRFS RAID0 >> for large read I/Os across six disks compared with ext4 atop mdad

Re: Understanding BTRFS RAID0 Performance

2018-10-05 Thread Duncan
Wilson, Ellis posted on Thu, 04 Oct 2018 21:33:29 + as excerpted: > Hi all, > > I'm attempting to understand a roughly 30% degradation in BTRFS RAID0 > for large read I/Os across six disks compared with ext4 atop mdadm > RAID0. > > Specifically, I achieve performa

Re: Understanding BTRFS RAID0 Performance

2018-10-05 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 5.10.2018 00:33, Wilson, Ellis wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm attempting to understand a roughly 30% degradation in BTRFS RAID0 > for large read I/Os across six disks compared with ext4 atop mdadm RAID0. > > Specifically, I achieve performance parity with BTRFS in terms of

Understanding BTRFS RAID0 Performance

2018-10-04 Thread Wilson, Ellis
Hi all, I'm attempting to understand a roughly 30% degradation in BTRFS RAID0 for large read I/Os across six disks compared with ext4 atop mdadm RAID0. Specifically, I achieve performance parity with BTRFS in terms of single-threaded write and read, and multi-threaded write, but poor

btrfs raid0 unable to mount

2013-10-25 Thread lilofile
when I use two disk to create raid0 in btrfs, after rebooting system,one disk unable to mount , error is as follows: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md0, missing codepage or helper program, or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try

btrfs raid0

2013-10-04 Thread ray clancy
How can I verify the read speed of a btrfs raid0 pair in archlinux.? I assume raid0 means striped activity in a paralleled mode at lease similar to raid0 in mdadm. How can I measure the btrfs read speed since it is copy-on-write which is not the norm in mdadm raid0.? Perhaps I cannot use

Re: btrfs raid0

2013-10-04 Thread Hugo Mills
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 04:15:22PM +, ray clancy wrote: How can I verify the read speed of a btrfs raid0 pair in archlinux.? I assume raid0 means striped activity in a paralleled mode at lease similar to raid0 in mdadm. How can I measure the btrfs read speed since it is copy-on-write

[Question] How to restore btrfs raid0 image file?

2013-05-26 Thread Liu Bo
Hi, So the case is, now I've got a btrfs image file, which is created from a raid0 btrfs fs. And if I run 'btrfs-image -r image_file /dev/sdf', then I have to mount it with 'degraded' mode, and that still fails because raid0 requires two disks at least. So any ideas how to make it work?