On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
A friend of mine who builds storage systems designed for HPC
use has been keeping an eye on btrfs and has just done some
testing of it with 2.6.36 and seems to like what he sees in
terms of stability.
That's a *very*
For example:
No device-yanking tests were done.
No power-cord yanking tests were done.
No device cables were yanked, shaken, or plugged/unplugged in rapid
succession.
No dd the raw device underneath the filesystem while doing file
I/O tests were done.
No recovery tests were done.
On 10/30/2010 05:19 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Chris Samuelch...@csamuel.org wrote:
A friend of mine who builds storage systems designed for HPC
use has been keeping an eye on btrfs and has just done some
testing of it with 2.6.36 and seems to like what he sees in
Hi,
A friend of mine who builds storage systems designed for HPC use
has been keeping an eye on btrfs and has just done some testing
of it with 2.6.36 and seems to like what he sees in terms of
stability.
http://scalability.org/?p=2711
This is nice to see, but we should
