On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:14:27PM -0500, Vineet Joglekar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> 1 more interesting observation regarding my executable file problem.
>
>
>
> If I copy an executable say "prac" from ext2 fs to my encrypted fs as prac1,
> prac1 doesnt run on the encrypted fs. but, if I ma
--- On Sun 02/06, Vineet Joglekar < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Vineet Joglekar [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:41:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Problem in accessing
TECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:31:24 +
Subject: Re: Problem in accessing executable files
Vineet Joglekar wrote:> Thanks for suggesting the single / few
bytes encryption test. I tried> doing that, but in vain. Maybe I am
Vineet Joglekar wrote:
> Thanks for suggesting the single / few bytes encryption test. I tried
> doing that, but in vain. Maybe I am going wrong somewhere else.
I'm pretty sure that mmap'ed access doesn't go through
do_generic_file_read().
Executable files (programs and shared libraries) are no
wrote:
From: John T. Williams [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:30 -0500
Subject: Re: Problem in accessing executable files
This is just a thought.Text files are better ab
This is just a thought.
Text files are better able to handle small faults. ie an extra space or
characters or even an unreadable piece of data might not cause the file to
become unreadable by most text editors. Binary files aren't as flexible.
Every bit could be an instruction to the processor an
