On 06/23/2010 10:21 PM, David Howells wrote:
Suresh Jayaraman sjayara...@suse.de wrote:
+rc = cifs_fscache_register();
+if (rc)
+goto out;
+
rc = cifs_init_inodecache();
if (rc)
goto out_clean_proc;
@@ -949,8 +954,10 @@ init_cifs(void)
On 06/23/2010 10:28 PM, David Howells wrote:
Suresh Jayaraman sjayara...@suse.de wrote:
Define superblock-level cache index objects (managed by cifsTconInfo
structs). Each superblock object is created in a server-level index object
and in itself an index into which inode-level objects are
Suresh Jayaraman sjayara...@suse.de wrote:
I think the creation time is currently being ignored as we won't be able
to accomodate in POSIX stat struct.
The FS-Cache interface doesn't use the POSIX stat struct, but it could be
really useful to save it and use it for cache coherency inside the
Suresh Jayaraman sjayara...@suse.de wrote:
Also, considering the UNC name of the resource (//server/share) may not
be a good idea too as the cache will not be used when for e.g. IPaddress
is used to mount.
You could convert the UNC name to an IP address, and just use that as your
key.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:36:04 +0400
Igor Druzhinin jaxbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the right thing to do is to not worry about upcalls for this at
first. Instead I think you'll want to create something like a
ntlminit program that takes user, password and host or domainname and
puts that
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:46:38 +0100
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
Looks like it mostly uses the ctime. IMO, the mtime would be a better
choice since it changes less frequently, but I don't guess that it
matters very much.
I'd've thought
Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
IIUC, updating mtime for a write is also an attribute change, and that
affects ctime. According to the stat(2) manpage:
You're right. Okay, ctime is the more frequently changed.
Note that Ext4 appears to have a file creation time field in its inode
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:46:38 +0100
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
Looks like it mostly uses the ctime. IMO, the mtime would be a better
choice since it changes less
