Hi,
attached are patches to spot the clock_gettime function and to use that and the
monotonic clock for timeout handling if possible.
If there are no objections, can you please apply them, Jeff?
Thanks
Björn
From 250d5b5df23d93ebed66a4c39bccf3a3614c54ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Eliminiate sparse warning during usage of crypto_shash_* APIs
error: bad constant expression
Allocate memory for shash descriptors once, so that we do not kmalloc/kfree it
for every signature generation (shash descriptor for md5 hash).
From ed753861981decc44b5660b52268077b74f3 Mon
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:07:55 -0500
Steve French smfre...@gmail.com wrote:
Any pointers to background on gettimeofday vs
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) and why the latter is better?
IIUC, the reason for this is that gettimeofday is affected by wallclock
changes (think NTP):
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:22:48 -0400
Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:07:55 -0500
Steve French smfre...@gmail.com wrote:
Any pointers to background on gettimeofday vs
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) and why the latter is better?
IIUC, the reason for this is that
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:08:09 +0200
Björn JACKE b...@sernet.de wrote:
On 2010-08-24 at 14:34 -0400 Jeff Layton sent off:
Any pointers to background on gettimeofday vs
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) and why the latter is better?
IIUC, the reason for this is that gettimeofday is
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:08:09 +0200
Björn JACKE b...@sernet.de wrote:
Ok, thanks for the clarification. Committed...
This should make the 4.7 release.
Thanks!
Yes - makes sense - thanks
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To
