Re: Cannot allocate memory error on mount

2010-08-26 Thread Suresh Jayaraman
On 08/26/2010 01:56 AM, joe hefner wrote: On a recent Fedora (13), I am seeing a mount failure message that I can not explain. I have a Windows Server 2003ýa with a share set up for access only for a specific username (say userfoo). If I try to mount it from Linux,ýusing userfoo and the

Re: Cannot allocate memory error on mount

2010-08-26 Thread Jeff Layton
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:46:09 +0530 Suresh Jayaraman sjayara...@suse.de wrote: On 08/26/2010 01:56 AM, joe hefner wrote: On a recent Fedora (13), I am seeing a mount failure message that I can not explain. I have a Windows Server 2003ýa with a share set up for access only for a specific

Re: Cannot allocate memory error on mount

2010-08-26 Thread Steve French
This is a good one to go upstream soon - if others critical to go upstream soon let me know. On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:46:09 +0530 Suresh Jayaraman sjayara...@suse.de wrote: On 08/26/2010 01:56 AM, joe hefner wrote: On a

[cifs bindaddr v2] cifs: Allow binding to local IP address.

2010-08-26 Thread Ben Greear
When using multi-homed machines, it's nice to be able to specify the local IP to use for outbound connections. This patch gives cifs the ability to bind to a particular IP address. Usage: mount -t cifs -o bindaddr=192.168.1.50,user=foo, ... Signed-off-by: Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com ---

Re: [cifs bindaddr v2] cifs: Allow binding to local IP address.

2010-08-26 Thread Steve French
There are clearly valid reasons for being able to select outgoing interface - I wouldn't mind doing this using IPv6 address format if that is more natural (since that can include ipv4 addresses) - or distinct ipv4/ipv6 On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote: On Thu,

Re: [cifs bindaddr v2] cifs: Allow binding to local IP address.

2010-08-26 Thread Jeff Layton
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:36:54 -0500 Steve French smfre...@gmail.com wrote: There are clearly valid reasons for being able to select outgoing interface - I wouldn't mind doing this using IPv6 address format if that is more natural (since that can include ipv4 addresses) - or distinct ipv4/ipv6