On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:32:20 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
---
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c | 57
-
1 files changed, 0
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:32:55 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
---
fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 15 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:34:27 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
---
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c | 71
+
fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:34:57 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
---
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c | 68 +---
fs/cifs/cifspdu.h
This gets removed in one of the patches.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:32:20 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:12:48 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
This gets removed in one of the patches.
Why do it there and not here? What's the point of a function prototype
in a header with no function to back it up?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Jeff Layton
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:35:23 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
---
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c | 33
fs/cifs/cifsglob.h|2 +-
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:34:27 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
---
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c | 71
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:35:57 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
---
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c | 41 +
fs/cifs/cifsproto.h |1
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:31:36 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
A better description would be nice
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:34:57 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
---
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c | 68
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:36:24 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
Use kernel crypto sync hash apis insetead of cifs crypto functions.
The calls typically corrospond one to one except that insead of
key init, setkey is
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:52:09 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:34:57 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:52:09 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:34:57 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:30:18 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
Make NTLMv2 as a default authentication mechanism within NTLMSSP
Enable cifs/smb signing
Use Crypto sync hash APIs instead of cifs crypto functions to
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
Here's a compile-tested patch to enable srcaddr= for smb2.
It converts a bit of smb2 to be more like cifs (seems smb2 was copy
and pasted and then cifs moved on).
It also seems like much of the common code could move
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Steve French smfre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
Here's a compile-tested patch to enable srcaddr= for smb2.
It converts a bit of smb2 to be more like cifs (seems smb2 was copy
and pasted and then
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:31:36 -0500
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
A better description would be nice
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
Attribue Value (AV) pairs or Target Info (TI) pairs are part of
ntlmv2 authentication.
Structure ntlmv2_resp had only definition for two av pairs.
So removed it, and now allocation of av pairs is dynamic.
For servers like Windows 7/2008, av
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
To calculate ntlmv2 response we need ti/av pair blob.
For sec mech like ntlmssp, the blob is plucked from type 2 response from
the server. From this blob, netbios name of the domain is retrieved,
if user has not already provided.
For sec
From: Shirish Pargaonkar shirishpargaon...@gmail.com
A key is exchanged with the server if client indicates so in flags in
type 1 messsage and server agrees in flag in type 2 message of ntlmssp
negotiation. If both client and agree, a key sent by client in
type 3 message of ntlmssp negotiation
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] ntlmv2 within ntlmssp - enable and sign using crypto apis
Three major functionality changes
Make NTLMv2 as a default authentication mechanism within NTLMSSP
Enable cifs/smb signing
Use Crypto sync hash APIs instead of cifs crypto functions to genereate
various hashes such
22 matches
Mail list logo
