On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:29:49 -0700
Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
On 08/27/2010 06:54 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
Also, I think bindaddr might not be the best name for the option. How
about sourceaddr or
On 08/27/2010 10:08 AM, Steve French wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Jeff Laytonjlay...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:29:49 -0700
Ben Greeargree...@candelatech.com wrote:
On 08/27/2010 06:54 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
Also, I think bindaddr might not be the best name for
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:12:16 -0700
Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
On 08/27/2010 10:08 AM, Steve French wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Jeff Laytonjlay...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:29:49 -0700
Ben Greeargree...@candelatech.com wrote:
On 08/27/2010
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:12:16 -0700
Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
On 08/27/2010 10:08 AM, Steve French wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Jeff Laytonjlay...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010
When using multi-homed machines, it's nice to be able to specify
the local IP to use for outbound connections. This patch gives
cifs the ability to bind to a particular IP address.
Usage: mount -t cifs -o bindaddr=192.168.1.50,user=foo, ...
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com
---
There are clearly valid reasons for being able to select outgoing
interface - I wouldn't mind doing this using IPv6 address format if
that is more natural (since that can include ipv4 addresses) - or
distinct ipv4/ipv6
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Jeff Layton jlay...@samba.org wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:36:54 -0500
Steve French smfre...@gmail.com wrote:
There are clearly valid reasons for being able to select outgoing
interface - I wouldn't mind doing this using IPv6 address format if
that is more natural (since that can include ipv4 addresses) - or
distinct ipv4/ipv6
