On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>>> Here is another update to the richacl patch queue.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:43:46AM -0600, Steve French wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:43:46AM -0600, Steve French wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 06:58:19PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:43:46AM -0600, Steve French wrote:
> >> I don't have strong disagreement with using pseudo-xattrs to
> >>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Here is another update to the richacl patch queue. This posting contains
> the patches ready to be merged; the patches later in the queue still need
> some more review.
It still has the same crappy fs interfaces with lots of
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> Here is another update to the richacl patch queue. This posting contains
>> the patches ready to be merged; the patches later in the queue
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:39:52PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > It still has the same crappy fs interfaces with lots of boilerplate
> > code
>
> Could you please be more specific so that I can trace this complaint
> to some actual code?
if (IS_RICHACL())
richacl_foo()
else