RE: OpenSSL with OCF

2005-11-02 Thread Ronen Shitrit
Hi I got your code, I did the patch correctly. If you look into the code you will see that only if SIGALRM is not defined then we will get to the do_multi Where you put it, in my code SIGALRM is defined, so I never get there. So I move it a little below see ssl.patch attached, I think it should

Re: VIA PadLock SHA support

2005-11-02 Thread Michal Ludvig
Herbert Xu wrote: The important thing for now is not which fallback you pick, but how you end up invoking them. I want to see the relationship between your driver and the fallback occur strictly at the crypto layer, not any lower :) Attached. In module_init() I call crypto_alloc_tfm() and