Preempt counter APIs have been split out, currently, hardirq.h just
includes irq_enter/exit APIs which are not used by openvswitch at all.
So, remove the unused hardirq.h.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi
Cc: Pravin Shelar
Cc: "David S. Miller"
Preempt counter APIs have been split out, currently, hardirq.h just
includes irq_enter/exit APIs which are not used by caif at all.
So, remove the unused hardirq.h.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi
Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin
Cc: "David S. Miller"
Preempt counter APIs have been split out, currently, hardirq.h just
includes irq_enter/exit APIs which are not used by TIPC at all.
So, remove the unused hardirq.h.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi
Cc: Jon Maloy
Cc: Ying Xue
Cc:
Preempt counter APIs have been split out, currently, hardirq.h just
includes irq_enter/exit APIs which are not used by kmemleak at all.
So, remove the unused hardirq.h.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Andrew Morton
On 17 November 2017 at 19:50, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like the following patch to be applied to stable for versions
> between 4.1 and 4.10 (inclusively).
>
> This is a minimal fix for a bug where arm32 kernels can use a much
> slower implementation of AES than is
Hi,
I'd like the following patch to be applied to stable for versions
between 4.1 and 4.10 (inclusively).
This is a minimal fix for a bug where arm32 kernels can use a much
slower implementation of AES than is actually available, potentially
forcing vendors to disable encryption on their
From: Colin Ian King
The break statement is indented one level too many, fix this.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:44:57 +
Casey Leedom wrote:
> | From: Raj, Ashok
> | Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 7:48 AM
> |
> | Reported by: Harsh
> | Reviewed by: Ashok Raj
> | Tested by: Jacob Pan
| From: Raj, Ashok
| Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 7:48 AM
|
| Reported by: Harsh
| Reviewed by: Ashok Raj
| Tested by: Jacob Pan
Thanks everyone! I've updated our internal bug on this issue
and noted
Hi Alex
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 09:18:14AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:09:33 -0800
> "Raj, Ashok" wrote:
>
> > >
> > > What do we do about this? I certainly can't rip out large page support
> > > and put a stable tag on the patch. I'm not
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:09:33 -0800
"Raj, Ashok" wrote:
> Hi Alex
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:32:44PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:54:56 -0800
> > Jacob Pan wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alex and all,
> > >
> > > Just
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:28:53PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 04:34:21PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:04:04AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:50:44AM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
> > > wrote:
> > >
>
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 04:34:21PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:04:04AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:50:44AM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> >
> > > I am assuming you are talking about the following patches - using
> > >
13 matches
Mail list logo