On 17 March 2014 22:18, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 at 04:02:33 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This implementation keeps the 64 bytes of workspace in registers rather
than on the stack, eliminating most of the loads and stores, and reducing
the instruction count by
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 at 08:26:00 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 17 March 2014 22:18, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 at 04:02:33 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This implementation keeps the 64 bytes of workspace in registers rather
than on the stack, eliminating
On Friday, March 14, 2014 at 04:02:33 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This implementation keeps the 64 bytes of workspace in registers rather
than on the stack, eliminating most of the loads and stores, and reducing
the instruction count by about 25%.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
This implementation keeps the 64 bytes of workspace in registers rather than
on the stack, eliminating most of the loads and stores, and reducing the
instruction count by about 25%.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
---
Hello all,
No performance numbers I am allowed to
