Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension

2011-10-04 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:42:46AM +1000, James Morris wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2011, Herbert Xu wrote: Well if James is OK with adding the user for this then I'm fine with adding the necessary infrastructure. Are you happy with the API? As there is only one user, we can add whatever we

Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension

2011-09-29 Thread Kasatkin, Dmitry
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:42 AM, James Morris jmor...@namei.org wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2011, Herbert Xu wrote: Well if James is OK with adding the user for this then I'm fine with adding the necessary infrastructure. Are you happy with the API? -- James Morris jmor...@namei.org Hello,

Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension

2011-09-28 Thread Kasatkin, Dmitry
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:15 AM, James Morris jmor...@namei.org wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote: It seems nobody wants to share their thoughts about it? Does this silence mean acceptance? Should I prepare final patches for merge? Not yet. I'd like to hear what the

Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension

2011-09-28 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011, Herbert Xu wrote: Well if James is OK with adding the user for this then I'm fine with adding the necessary infrastructure. Are you happy with the API? -- James Morris jmor...@namei.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body

Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension

2011-09-26 Thread Kasatkin, Dmitry
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Mimi Zohar zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 17:20 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: Hello, Changes to version 2.0: - MPI patch has been split to smaller in order to go to mailing lists.   First 2 patches include only source and header files

Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension

2011-09-26 Thread James Morris
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote: It seems nobody wants to share their thoughts about it? Does this silence mean acceptance? Should I prepare final patches for merge? Not yet. I'd like to hear what the crypto folk think about the crypto. -- James Morris jmor...@namei.org -- To

Re: [RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension

2011-09-20 Thread Mimi Zohar
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 17:20 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: Hello, Changes to version 2.0: - MPI patch has been split to smaller in order to go to mailing lists. First 2 patches include only source and header files which are needed to build ksign verification. Headers and sources are

[RFC v2.1 0/6] evm: digital signature verification extension

2011-09-13 Thread Dmitry Kasatkin
Hello, Changes to version 2.0: - MPI patch has been split to smaller in order to go to mailing lists. First 2 patches include only source and header files which are needed to build ksign verification. Headers and sources are split just to meet 100k kernel.org limit. Last patch adds all