On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:54:09 +0300
Tudor Ambarus tudor.amba...@freescale.com wrote:
+ /*
+ * Job Descriptor and Shared Descriptors
+ * must all fit into the 64-word Descriptor h/w Buffer
+ */
+ if (DESC_GCM_DEC_LEN + DESC_JOB_IO_LEN +
+ ctx-enckeylen =
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:54:10 +0300
Tudor Ambarus tudor.amba...@freescale.com wrote:
+static int rfc4106_set_sh_desc(struct crypto_aead *aead)
...
+ /*
+ * Job Descriptor and Shared Descriptors
+ * must all fit into the 64-word Descriptor h/w Buffer
+ */
+ if
On 10/09/2014 07:12 PM, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
On 10/09/2014 02:42 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
I don't think cpu hotplug matters here. This is one (probe) time
determination if the configuration is optimal or not and if it makes
sense to use this accelerator or not.
It absolutely matters.
On 10/10/2014 04:23 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
Sure, but I still think that we are safe here.
No, you're not. Dropping a single CPU changes num_online_cpus(), which
results in
static uint8_t adf_get_dev_node_id(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
unsigned int bus_per_cpu = 0;
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 05:10:55 -0500
Ambarus Tudor-Dan-B38632 tudor.amba...@freescale.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:54:10 +0300
Tudor Ambarus tudor.amba...@freescale.com wrote:
+static int rfc4106_setauthsize(struct crypto_aead *authenc,
+ unsigned int authsize)
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 03:47:18 -0500
Ambarus Tudor-Dan-B38632 tudor.amba...@freescale.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:54:09 +0300
Tudor Ambarus tudor.amba...@freescale.com wrote:
+ /* Galois Counter Mode */
+ {
+ .name = gcm(aes),
+ .driver_name = gcm-aes-caam,
On 10/10/2014 09:25 AM, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
On 10/10/2014 04:23 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
Sure, but I still think that we are safe here.
No, you're not. Dropping a single CPU changes num_online_cpus(), which
results in
static uint8_t adf_get_dev_node_id(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
