On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:05:05PM +0200, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>
> with linux-next-20160726, I get this:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> /mnt/scratch/nic/linux-next/mm/slab.h:388
Does this patch help?
> I would have sent a patch, but there is another point which
Romain Perier wrote:
> So far, the cache of the ahash requests was updated from the 'complete'
> operation. This complete operation is called from mv_cesa_tdma_process
> before the cleanup operation, which means that the content of req->src
> can be read and
Romain Perier wrote:
> So far in mv_cesa_ablkcipher_dma_req_init, if an error is thrown while
> the tdma chain is built there is a memory leak. This issue exists
> because the chain is assigned later at the end of the function, so the
> cleanup function is called
Romain Perier wrote:
> The flag CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG is optional and can be set from the
> user to put requests into the backlog queue when the main cryptographic
> queue is full. Before calling mv_cesa_tdma_chain we must check the value
> of the return
Instant cash Loan with same day payout on all kinds of Loan are available at
Quick Financial Home were loan is offered at 2% per annul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> Are you planning on pulling the random tree this cycle? I'm not sure
> if you wanted to let it soak for a few days in linux-next, or whether
> you want to wait another full release cycle
It's next in line in my queue, so
Hi,
with linux-next-20160726, I get this:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
/mnt/scratch/nic/linux-next/mm/slab.h:388
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 369, name: systemd-udevd
no locks held by systemd-udevd/369.
CPU: 2 PID: 369 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 02:44:24AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> The following changes since commit 1a695a905c18548062509178b98bc91e67510864:
>
> Linux 4.7-rc1 (2016-05-29 09:29:24 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2016, 08:55:31 CEST schrieb David Howells:
Hi David,
> Mat Martineau wrote:
> > > Though, shall I stuff the wrapper code back into the existing dh_compute
> > > functions or can I leave them as separate functions?
> >
> > I'm not sure.
Mat Martineau wrote:
> > Though, shall I stuff the wrapper code back into the existing dh_compute
> > functions or can I leave them as separate functions?
>
> I'm not sure. In the existing code there's one keyctl wrapper per keyctl
> command. A combined
10 matches
Mail list logo