Re: [PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues in tunnels

2015-05-29 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 05/28/2015 12:15 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote: On 05/28/2015 01:40 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:18:51AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: On 05/27/2015 10:36 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: This change makes it

Re: [PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues in tunnels

2015-05-28 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 05/28/2015 01:40 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:18:51AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: On 05/27/2015 10:36 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: This change makes it so that we use icmpv6_send to report PMTU

Re: [PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues in tunnels

2015-05-28 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 05/27/2015 10:36 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: This change makes it so that we use icmpv6_send to report PMTU issues back into tunnels in the case that the resulting packet is larger than the MTU of the outgoing interface.

Re: [PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues in tunnels

2015-05-28 Thread Steffen Klassert
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:18:51AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: On 05/27/2015 10:36 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: This change makes it so that we use icmpv6_send to report PMTU issues back into tunnels in the case that the

[PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues in tunnels

2015-05-27 Thread Alexander Duyck
This change makes it so that we use icmpv6_send to report PMTU issues back into tunnels in the case that the resulting packet is larger than the MTU of the outgoing interface. Previously xfrm_local_error was being used in this case, however this was resulting in no changes, I suspect due to the

Re: [PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues in tunnels

2015-05-27 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: This change makes it so that we use icmpv6_send to report PMTU issues back into tunnels in the case that the resulting packet is larger than the MTU of the outgoing interface. Previously xfrm_local_error was being used in this

Re: [PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues in tunnels

2015-05-27 Thread Steffen Klassert
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:49:19PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: This change makes it so that we use icmpv6_send to report PMTU issues back into tunnels in the case that the resulting packet is larger than the MTU of the outgoing

Re: [PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues in tunnels

2015-05-27 Thread Steffen Klassert
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: This change makes it so that we use icmpv6_send to report PMTU issues back into tunnels in the case that the resulting packet is larger than the MTU of the outgoing interface. Previously xfrm_local_error was being used in this