On 06/30/2017 07:27 AM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> Can you split this patch into two? One patch to choose rng based on
> the quality and another for not overriding user decided rng.
>
> Some more minor comments below.
>
> On 29 June 2017 at 15:33, Harald Freudenberger
>
Hi Harald,
Can you split this patch into two? One patch to choose rng based on
the quality and another for not overriding user decided rng.
Some more minor comments below.
On 29 June 2017 at 15:33, Harald Freudenberger
wrote:
> The hwrng core implementation currently
The hwrng core implementation currently doesn't consider the
quality field of the struct hwrng. So the first registered rng
is the winner and further rng sources even with much better
quality are ignored.
The behavior should be that always the best rng with the highest
quality rate should be used