Hi Maxime,
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:29:31AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:09:44AM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > > Which speed are the SS clocks ?
> >
> > The AHB SS clk is running at 300 MHz and the SS clk at 150 MHz. SS clk
> > is at the expected rate but the AHB
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:09:44AM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > Which speed are the SS clocks ?
>
> The AHB SS clk is running at 300 MHz and the SS clk at 150 MHz. SS clk
> is at the expected rate but the AHB SS clk has a higher rate that what's
> expected.
>
> In the probing function only
Hi Corentin,
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 04:55:01PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:06:51PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> >
> > + /*
> > +* The datasheet isn't very clear about when to retrieve the digest. The
> > +* bit SS_DATA_END is cleared when the engine
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:06:51PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> The run-time self-tests fail quite early, as soon as the input block
> size is larger than 64 bytes:
>
> alg: hash: Test 4 failed for sha1-sun4i-ss
> : b9 c9 1e 52 c0 26 d8 39 81 ff f2 3c 99 b1 27 b2
> 0010: 30 d6
The run-time self-tests fail quite early, as soon as the input block
size is larger than 64 bytes:
alg: hash: Test 4 failed for sha1-sun4i-ss
: b9 c9 1e 52 c0 26 d8 39 81 ff f2 3c 99 b1 27 b2
0010: 30 d6 c9 85
One thing to notice is the value of the last word, which is the one
