On 10/13/2014 06:24 PM, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
Hi,
These two patches fix invalid (zero length) dma mapping and
enforce numa configuration for maximum performance.
Change log:
v2 - Removed numa node calculation based bus number and use predefined
functions instead.
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:34:33AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
Looks like these two are not in cryptodev-2.6 yet.
Do you plan to merge it sometime soon or should I generate incremental
patches based on crypto-2.6 instead of cryptodev-2.6
Just generate them on top of all your existing patches.
On 10/24/2014 07:45 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:25:45AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 10/15/2014 06:35 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 14/10/14 03:24, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
Hi,
These two patches fix invalid (zero length) dma mapping and
enforce numa configuration
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 07:43:08AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
On 10/24/2014 07:45 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:25:45AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 10/15/2014 06:35 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 14/10/14 03:24, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
Hi,
These two patches
On 11/17/2014 08:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
Because it showed up in Linus's tree _after_ 3.17.3-rc1 was released?
How can I go back in time?
I thought it was already possible, no? :)
So will it be in 3.17.4?
Thanks,
Tadeusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:20:34AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
On 11/17/2014 08:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
Because it showed up in Linus's tree _after_ 3.17.3-rc1 was released?
How can I go back in time?
I thought it was already possible, no? :)
So will it be in 3.17.4?
Possibly, if I get
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:25:45AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 10/15/2014 06:35 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 14/10/14 03:24, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
Hi,
These two patches fix invalid (zero length) dma mapping and
enforce numa configuration for maximum performance.
Change
On 14/10/14 03:24, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
Hi,
These two patches fix invalid (zero length) dma mapping and
enforce numa configuration for maximum performance.
Change log:
v2 - Removed numa node calculation based bus number and use predefined
functions instead.
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk
On 10/15/2014 06:35 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 14/10/14 03:24, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
Hi,
These two patches fix invalid (zero length) dma mapping and
enforce numa configuration for maximum performance.
Change log:
v2 - Removed numa node calculation based bus number and use predefined
On 10/15/2014 04:25 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
I just gave a quick run of these patches and they seem to fix the NUMA issue
and
the 0 length warnings.
Tested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov niko...@redhat.com
Thanks Nik :)
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava pra...@redhat.com
Thank you Nik and
Hi,
These two patches fix invalid (zero length) dma mapping and
enforce numa configuration for maximum performance.
Change log:
v2 - Removed numa node calculation based bus number and use predefined
functions instead.
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk tadeusz.st...@intel.com
---
Tadeusz Struk (2):
11 matches
Mail list logo