Re: [PATCH] hw_random: core: Reset user selected rng by writing "" to rng_current
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:34:04PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: > User is able to select a chosen rng by writing its name to rng_current > but there is no way to reset it without unbinding the rng. Let user > write "" to rng_current and delesect the chosen rng. > > Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar MuralidharanPatch applied. Thanks. -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Re: [PATCH] hw_random: core: Reset user selected rng by writing "" to rng_current
Hi Harald, On 30 October 2017 at 18:58, Harald Freudenbergerwrote: > On 10/27/2017 07:04 PM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: >> User is able to select a chosen rng by writing its name to rng_current >> but there is no way to reset it without unbinding the rng. Let user >> write "" to rng_current and delesect the chosen rng. >> >> Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan >> --- >> drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 51 >> +++ >> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c >> index 9701ac7..be03024 100644 >> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c >> @@ -292,26 +292,48 @@ static struct miscdevice rng_miscdev = { >> .groups = rng_dev_groups, >> }; >> >> +static int enable_best_rng(void) >> +{ >> + int ret = -ENODEV; >> + >> + BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(_mutex)); >> + >> + /* rng_list is sorted by quality, use the best (=first) one */ >> + if (!list_empty(_list)) { >> + struct hwrng *new_rng; >> + >> + new_rng = list_entry(rng_list.next, struct hwrng, list); >> + ret = ((new_rng == current_rng) ? 0 : >> set_current_rng(new_rng)); >> + if (!ret) >> + cur_rng_set_by_user = 0; >> + } >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> static ssize_t hwrng_attr_current_store(struct device *dev, >> struct device_attribute *attr, >> const char *buf, size_t len) >> { >> - int err; >> + int err = -ENODEV; > Two lines later err is assigned the return value of > mutex_lock_interruptible(). > So the -ENODEV value assignment does nothing. Indeed true. Will change this when I make a v2. I am even thinking if it makes sense to return error when user writes "" to rng_current and there is no rng device registered. I think returning 0 should be fine. >> struct hwrng *rng; >> >> err = mutex_lock_interruptible(_mutex); >> if (err) >> return -ERESTARTSYS; >> - err = -ENODEV; >> - list_for_each_entry(rng, _list, list) { >> - if (sysfs_streq(rng->name, buf)) { >> - err = 0; >> - cur_rng_set_by_user = 1; >> - if (rng != current_rng) >> + >> + if (sysfs_streq(buf, "")) { >> + err = enable_best_rng(); >> + } else { >> + list_for_each_entry(rng, _list, list) { >> + if (sysfs_streq(rng->name, buf)) { >> + cur_rng_set_by_user = 1; >> err = set_current_rng(rng); >> - break; >> + break; >> + } >> } >> } >> + >> mutex_unlock(_mutex); >> >> return err ? : len; >> @@ -493,17 +515,8 @@ void hwrng_unregister(struct hwrng *rng) >> mutex_lock(_mutex); >> >> list_del(>list); >> - if (current_rng == rng) { >> - drop_current_rng(); >> - cur_rng_set_by_user = 0; >> - /* rng_list is sorted by quality, use the best (=first) one */ >> - if (!list_empty(_list)) { >> - struct hwrng *new_rng; >> - >> - new_rng = list_entry(rng_list.next, struct hwrng, >> list); >> - set_current_rng(new_rng); >> - } >> - } >> + if (current_rng == rng) >> + enable_best_rng(); >> >> if (list_empty(_list)) { >> mutex_unlock(_mutex); > looks like for me. > reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger > Thank you. Thanks, PrasannaKumar
Re: [PATCH] hw_random: core: Reset user selected rng by writing "" to rng_current
On 10/27/2017 07:04 PM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: > User is able to select a chosen rng by writing its name to rng_current > but there is no way to reset it without unbinding the rng. Let user > write "" to rng_current and delesect the chosen rng. > > Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan> --- > drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 51 > +++ > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > index 9701ac7..be03024 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > @@ -292,26 +292,48 @@ static struct miscdevice rng_miscdev = { > .groups = rng_dev_groups, > }; > > +static int enable_best_rng(void) > +{ > + int ret = -ENODEV; > + > + BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(_mutex)); > + > + /* rng_list is sorted by quality, use the best (=first) one */ > + if (!list_empty(_list)) { > + struct hwrng *new_rng; > + > + new_rng = list_entry(rng_list.next, struct hwrng, list); > + ret = ((new_rng == current_rng) ? 0 : set_current_rng(new_rng)); > + if (!ret) > + cur_rng_set_by_user = 0; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static ssize_t hwrng_attr_current_store(struct device *dev, > struct device_attribute *attr, > const char *buf, size_t len) > { > - int err; > + int err = -ENODEV; Two lines later err is assigned the return value of mutex_lock_interruptible(). So the -ENODEV value assignment does nothing. > struct hwrng *rng; > > err = mutex_lock_interruptible(_mutex); > if (err) > return -ERESTARTSYS; > - err = -ENODEV; > - list_for_each_entry(rng, _list, list) { > - if (sysfs_streq(rng->name, buf)) { > - err = 0; > - cur_rng_set_by_user = 1; > - if (rng != current_rng) > + > + if (sysfs_streq(buf, "")) { > + err = enable_best_rng(); > + } else { > + list_for_each_entry(rng, _list, list) { > + if (sysfs_streq(rng->name, buf)) { > + cur_rng_set_by_user = 1; > err = set_current_rng(rng); > - break; > + break; > + } > } > } > + > mutex_unlock(_mutex); > > return err ? : len; > @@ -493,17 +515,8 @@ void hwrng_unregister(struct hwrng *rng) > mutex_lock(_mutex); > > list_del(>list); > - if (current_rng == rng) { > - drop_current_rng(); > - cur_rng_set_by_user = 0; > - /* rng_list is sorted by quality, use the best (=first) one */ > - if (!list_empty(_list)) { > - struct hwrng *new_rng; > - > - new_rng = list_entry(rng_list.next, struct hwrng, list); > - set_current_rng(new_rng); > - } > - } > + if (current_rng == rng) > + enable_best_rng(); > > if (list_empty(_list)) { > mutex_unlock(_mutex); looks like for me. reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger
Re: [PATCH] hw_random: core: Reset user selected rng by writing "" to rng_current
Hi Harald, On 30 October 2017 at 13:40, Harald Freudenbergerwrote: > That's a really good idea. I also thought about something like that. Do you mind reviewing the code? Thanks, PrasannaKumar
Re: [PATCH] hw_random: core: Reset user selected rng by writing "" to rng_current
On 10/27/2017 07:04 PM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: > User is able to select a chosen rng by writing its name to rng_current > but there is no way to reset it without unbinding the rng. Let user > write "" to rng_current and delesect the chosen rng. > > Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan> --- > drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 51 > +++ > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > index 9701ac7..be03024 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > @@ -292,26 +292,48 @@ static struct miscdevice rng_miscdev = { > .groups = rng_dev_groups, > }; > > +static int enable_best_rng(void) > +{ > + int ret = -ENODEV; > + > + BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(_mutex)); > + > + /* rng_list is sorted by quality, use the best (=first) one */ > + if (!list_empty(_list)) { > + struct hwrng *new_rng; > + > + new_rng = list_entry(rng_list.next, struct hwrng, list); > + ret = ((new_rng == current_rng) ? 0 : set_current_rng(new_rng)); > + if (!ret) > + cur_rng_set_by_user = 0; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static ssize_t hwrng_attr_current_store(struct device *dev, > struct device_attribute *attr, > const char *buf, size_t len) > { > - int err; > + int err = -ENODEV; > struct hwrng *rng; > > err = mutex_lock_interruptible(_mutex); > if (err) > return -ERESTARTSYS; > - err = -ENODEV; > - list_for_each_entry(rng, _list, list) { > - if (sysfs_streq(rng->name, buf)) { > - err = 0; > - cur_rng_set_by_user = 1; > - if (rng != current_rng) > + > + if (sysfs_streq(buf, "")) { > + err = enable_best_rng(); > + } else { > + list_for_each_entry(rng, _list, list) { > + if (sysfs_streq(rng->name, buf)) { > + cur_rng_set_by_user = 1; > err = set_current_rng(rng); > - break; > + break; > + } > } > } > + > mutex_unlock(_mutex); > > return err ? : len; > @@ -493,17 +515,8 @@ void hwrng_unregister(struct hwrng *rng) > mutex_lock(_mutex); > > list_del(>list); > - if (current_rng == rng) { > - drop_current_rng(); > - cur_rng_set_by_user = 0; > - /* rng_list is sorted by quality, use the best (=first) one */ > - if (!list_empty(_list)) { > - struct hwrng *new_rng; > - > - new_rng = list_entry(rng_list.next, struct hwrng, list); > - set_current_rng(new_rng); > - } > - } > + if (current_rng == rng) > + enable_best_rng(); > > if (list_empty(_list)) { > mutex_unlock(_mutex); That's a really good idea. I also thought about something like that. regards Harald Freudenberger