Re: [RESEND,PATCH v4 3/3] crypto : stm32 - Add STM32F4 CRC32 support
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:44:23PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:27:36AM +0300, Cosar Dindar wrote: > > This patch adds CRC (CRC32 Crypto) support for STM32F4 series. > > > > As an hardware limitation polynomial and key setting are not supported. > > They are fixed as 0x4C11DB7 (poly) and 0x (key). > > CRC32C Castagnoli algorithm is not used. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cosar Dindar> > Reviewed-by: Fabien Dessenne > > This patch doesn't apply anymore. Please rebase. > > Thanks, OK, I'll rebase and send a new patch including new changes. Thanks, Best Regards, Cosar. > -- > Email: Herbert Xu > Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ > PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Re: [RESEND,PATCH v4 3/3] crypto : stm32 - Add STM32F4 CRC32 support
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:27:36AM +0300, Cosar Dindar wrote: > This patch adds CRC (CRC32 Crypto) support for STM32F4 series. > > As an hardware limitation polynomial and key setting are not supported. > They are fixed as 0x4C11DB7 (poly) and 0x (key). > CRC32C Castagnoli algorithm is not used. > > Signed-off-by: Cosar Dindar> Reviewed-by: Fabien Dessenne This patch doesn't apply anymore. Please rebase. Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Re: [RESEND,PATCH v4 3/3] crypto : stm32 - Add STM32F4 CRC32 support
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:23:44PM +, Lionel DEBIEVE wrote: > Hi Cosar, > > - ret = crypto_register_shashes(algs, ARRAY_SIZE(algs)); > + /* For F4 series only CRC32 algorithm will be used */ > + if (of_device_is_compatible(crc->dev->of_node, "st,stm32f4-crc")) > + algs_size = 1; > + else > + algs_size = ARRAY_SIZE(algs); > + > + ret = crypto_register_shashes(algs, algs_size); > > Should it be better to have a dedicated array per platform data instead? > Could be new platform update? > > BR, > > Lionel > Hi Lionel, Thanks for the comment. It might be better to seperate shash_alg array according to the platform, one alg array for F7 and one for M4. Adding a new array definition for M4 platform with only CRC-32 algorithm might be enough. This action would be necessary since it might cause problem while unregistering with your last patch. BR, Cosar > > On 07/17/2017 10:27 AM, Cosar Dindar wrote: > > This patch adds CRC (CRC32 Crypto) support for STM32F4 series. > > > > As an hardware limitation polynomial and key setting are not supported. > > They are fixed as 0x4C11DB7 (poly) and 0x (key). > > CRC32C Castagnoli algorithm is not used. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cosar Dindar> > Reviewed-by: Fabien Dessenne > > --- > > drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c | 68 > > -- > > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c > > b/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c > > index ec83b1e..12fbd98 100644 > > --- a/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > > > #include > > @@ -39,6 +40,9 @@ struct stm32_crc { > > struct clk *clk; > > u8 pending_data[sizeof(u32)]; > > size_t nb_pending_bytes; > > + bool key_support; > > + bool poly_support; > > + bool reverse_support; > > }; > > > > struct stm32_crc_list { > > @@ -106,13 +110,31 @@ static int stm32_crc_init(struct shash_desc *desc) > > } > > spin_unlock_bh(_list.lock); > > > > - /* Reset, set key, poly and configure in bit reverse mode */ > > - writel(bitrev32(mctx->key), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_INIT); > > - writel(bitrev32(mctx->poly), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_POL); > > - writel(CRC_CR_RESET | CRC_CR_REVERSE, ctx->crc->regs + CRC_CR); > > + /* set key */ > > + if (ctx->crc->key_support) { > > + writel(bitrev32(mctx->key), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_INIT); > > + } else if (mctx->key != CRC_INIT_DEFAULT) { > > + dev_err(ctx->crc->dev, "Unsupported key value! Should be: > > 0x%x\n", > > + CRC_INIT_DEFAULT); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + /* set poly */ > > + if (ctx->crc->poly_support) > > + writel(bitrev32(mctx->poly), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_POL); > > + > > + /* reset and configure in bit reverse mode if supported */ > > + if (ctx->crc->reverse_support) > > + writel(CRC_CR_RESET | CRC_CR_REVERSE, ctx->crc->regs + CRC_CR); > > + else > > + writel(CRC_CR_RESET, ctx->crc->regs + CRC_CR); > > + > > + /* store partial result */ > > + if (!ctx->crc->reverse_support) > > + ctx->partial = bitrev32(readl(crc->regs + CRC_DR)); > > + else > > + ctx->partial = readl(ctx->crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > > > - /* Store partial result */ > > - ctx->partial = readl(ctx->crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > ctx->crc->nb_pending_bytes = 0; > > > > return 0; > > @@ -135,7 +157,12 @@ static int stm32_crc_update(struct shash_desc *desc, > > const u8 *d8, > > > > if (crc->nb_pending_bytes == sizeof(u32)) { > > /* Process completed pending data */ > > - writel(*(u32 *)crc->pending_data, crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > + if (!ctx->crc->reverse_support) > > + writel(bitrev32(*(u32 *)crc->pending_data), > > + crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > + else > > + writel(*(u32 *)crc->pending_data, > > + crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > crc->nb_pending_bytes = 0; > > } > > } > > @@ -143,10 +170,16 @@ static int stm32_crc_update(struct shash_desc *desc, > > const u8 *d8, > > d32 = (u32 *)d8; > > for (i = 0; i < length >> 2; i++) > > /* Process 32 bits data */ > > - writel(*(d32++), crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > + if (!ctx->crc->reverse_support) > > + writel(bitrev32(*(d32++)), crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > + else > > + writel(*(d32++), crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > > > /* Store partial result */ > > - ctx->partial = readl(crc->regs +
Re: [RESEND,PATCH v4 3/3] crypto : stm32 - Add STM32F4 CRC32 support
Hi Cosar, - ret = crypto_register_shashes(algs, ARRAY_SIZE(algs)); + /* For F4 series only CRC32 algorithm will be used */ + if (of_device_is_compatible(crc->dev->of_node, "st,stm32f4-crc")) + algs_size = 1; + else + algs_size = ARRAY_SIZE(algs); + + ret = crypto_register_shashes(algs, algs_size); Should it be better to have a dedicated array per platform data instead? Could be new platform update? BR, Lionel On 07/17/2017 10:27 AM, Cosar Dindar wrote: > This patch adds CRC (CRC32 Crypto) support for STM32F4 series. > > As an hardware limitation polynomial and key setting are not supported. > They are fixed as 0x4C11DB7 (poly) and 0x (key). > CRC32C Castagnoli algorithm is not used. > > Signed-off-by: Cosar Dindar> Reviewed-by: Fabien Dessenne > --- > drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c | 68 > -- > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c > b/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c > index ec83b1e..12fbd98 100644 > --- a/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c > +++ b/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > #include > @@ -39,6 +40,9 @@ struct stm32_crc { > struct clk *clk; > u8 pending_data[sizeof(u32)]; > size_t nb_pending_bytes; > + bool key_support; > + bool poly_support; > + bool reverse_support; > }; > > struct stm32_crc_list { > @@ -106,13 +110,31 @@ static int stm32_crc_init(struct shash_desc *desc) > } > spin_unlock_bh(_list.lock); > > - /* Reset, set key, poly and configure in bit reverse mode */ > - writel(bitrev32(mctx->key), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_INIT); > - writel(bitrev32(mctx->poly), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_POL); > - writel(CRC_CR_RESET | CRC_CR_REVERSE, ctx->crc->regs + CRC_CR); > + /* set key */ > + if (ctx->crc->key_support) { > + writel(bitrev32(mctx->key), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_INIT); > + } else if (mctx->key != CRC_INIT_DEFAULT) { > + dev_err(ctx->crc->dev, "Unsupported key value! Should be: > 0x%x\n", > + CRC_INIT_DEFAULT); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* set poly */ > + if (ctx->crc->poly_support) > + writel(bitrev32(mctx->poly), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_POL); > + > + /* reset and configure in bit reverse mode if supported */ > + if (ctx->crc->reverse_support) > + writel(CRC_CR_RESET | CRC_CR_REVERSE, ctx->crc->regs + CRC_CR); > + else > + writel(CRC_CR_RESET, ctx->crc->regs + CRC_CR); > + > + /* store partial result */ > + if (!ctx->crc->reverse_support) > + ctx->partial = bitrev32(readl(crc->regs + CRC_DR)); > + else > + ctx->partial = readl(ctx->crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > - /* Store partial result */ > - ctx->partial = readl(ctx->crc->regs + CRC_DR); > ctx->crc->nb_pending_bytes = 0; > > return 0; > @@ -135,7 +157,12 @@ static int stm32_crc_update(struct shash_desc *desc, > const u8 *d8, > > if (crc->nb_pending_bytes == sizeof(u32)) { > /* Process completed pending data */ > - writel(*(u32 *)crc->pending_data, crc->regs + CRC_DR); > + if (!ctx->crc->reverse_support) > + writel(bitrev32(*(u32 *)crc->pending_data), > +crc->regs + CRC_DR); > + else > + writel(*(u32 *)crc->pending_data, > +crc->regs + CRC_DR); > crc->nb_pending_bytes = 0; > } > } > @@ -143,10 +170,16 @@ static int stm32_crc_update(struct shash_desc *desc, > const u8 *d8, > d32 = (u32 *)d8; > for (i = 0; i < length >> 2; i++) > /* Process 32 bits data */ > - writel(*(d32++), crc->regs + CRC_DR); > + if (!ctx->crc->reverse_support) > + writel(bitrev32(*(d32++)), crc->regs + CRC_DR); > + else > + writel(*(d32++), crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > /* Store partial result */ > - ctx->partial = readl(crc->regs + CRC_DR); > + if (!ctx->crc->reverse_support) > + ctx->partial = bitrev32(readl(crc->regs + CRC_DR)); > + else > + ctx->partial = readl(crc->regs + CRC_DR); > > /* Check for pending data (non 32 bits) */ > length &= 3; > @@ -243,6 +276,7 @@ static int stm32_crc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct stm32_crc *crc; > struct resource *res; > int ret; > + int algs_size; > > crc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*crc), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!crc) > @@