On 10/29/07, Dominik Kuhlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 29 October 2007 14:54, Daniel Golle wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 12:00 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pro7HD:12722:h:0:22000:255:259:10200
succ: 0 | fail: 100
Could someone please post a link to a or a dmesg log file
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 20:52:59 +0300, Tomi Orava wrote:
Hi,
AFAICS, all channels work here. The remote control also mostly works:
the OK and the blue button don't generate the proper lirc events.
I've fixed the remote control key codes as they have been in the original
Cinergy T2
On 10/30/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at tuner-xc2028.c, there seem to be some issues:
a) priv-count is initialized to zero by the first user. This would
result in priv either being freed prematurely or never freed at all.
b) If priv is freed, it doesn't
Except for the wifi part, this card seemed to me to be similar to ASUS
p7131 hybrid. There is a saa7131e, a tda10046a and a 8275ac1 on it.
The card is detected as unknown by the saa7134 driver. I've tried
some card values, eg 112, and then it finds the tda1004x. But
scanning fails:
tune to:
Hi Manu,
three weeks have passed since Steve expressed his
discomfort with the HVR4000 merge being blocked
waiting for multiproto.
Can you give us a time frame for when the multiproto
merge will happen?
Or, alternatively, can we split multiproto into
two repositories, one with API + dvb-core
I think this tree might be preperation for that (least i'm hoping it is)
http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mchehab/merge
see [linux-dvb] [RFC] merged tree with newer patch series thread
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Hi Manu,
three weeks have passed since Steve expressed his
discomfort with the HVR4000
Hi Johannes,
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Hi Manu,
three weeks have passed since Steve expressed his
discomfort with the HVR4000 merge being blocked
waiting for multiproto.
Before i state anything, Current DVB-S2 API status:
* CCM (Complete)
* API backward compatibility (Complete, guess
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007, Manu Abraham wrote:
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
three weeks have passed since Steve expressed his
discomfort with the HVR4000 merge being blocked
waiting for multiproto.
Before i state anything, Current DVB-S2 API status:
[snip]
Thanks, that's useful.
Can
[resending because I was also kicked off the list, so sorry for the,
h, spam, but it's not my fault]
In a misguided attempt to curb spam, someone at linuxtv.org decided to
use the sorbs blacklist.
Like most other blacklists out there, it is *not* accurate in its
listings, in fact it listed
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007, Luca Olivetti wrote:
In a misguided attempt to curb spam, someone at linuxtv.org decided to
use the sorbs blacklist.
...
If you decide to go on relying on blacklists, at least use the one
listing confirmed sources of spam, not the broader one using arbitrary
and flawed
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007, Manu Abraham wrote:
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
three weeks have passed since Steve expressed his
discomfort with the HVR4000 merge being blocked
waiting for multiproto.
Before i state anything, Current DVB-S2 API status:
[snip]
El Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:41:27 +0100
is the first complaint since I switched to safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net
about one year ago)
It doesn't surprise me, since those affected cannot contact you. It's
the perfect system to avoid complaints ;-)
it has very low priority for me, sorry.
Well, I hope you
Hi, first excuse my english.
i have a NOT ONLY TV usb DVB-T Lifeview. Here the details:
Chipset: af9016
Tuner: MT2061
lsusb:
Bus 001 Device 014: ID 15a4:9016
Distro: Ubuntu 7.10 kernel 2.6.22-14-generic on x86_64
I downloading the 9015 driver from:
http://jusst.de/hg/af901x/
I change the
Sorbs will remove you from their list once you contact them and prove you have
a static IP address though.
When my company moved buildings we went to a new ISP and was assigned a static
address that was previously part of the ISP's dynamic pool.
The reverse resolve for it was
Dominik Kuhlen wrote:
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 01:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at this point the results are the same (meter lights up but not much else)
so I can't say if this is better or worse at this point
although I've noticed the LED is staying at orange when it should be going
En/na Jim Barber ha escrit:
Sorbs will remove you from their list once you contact them and prove
you have a static IP address though.
Yes, they did, *twice*, since they wrongly listed my address *twice*
(though I thought I already stated that) but I shouldn't go through all
of this.
Luca Olivetti wrote:
En/na Jim Barber ha escrit:
Sorbs will remove you from their list once you contact them and prove
you have a static IP address though.
Yes, they did, *twice*, since they wrongly listed my address *twice*
(though I thought I already stated that) but I shouldn't go
Am Mittwoch, den 31.10.2007, 02:44 +0100 schrieb thomas schorpp:
Luca Olivetti wrote:
En/na Jim Barber ha escrit:
Sorbs will remove you from their list once you contact them and prove
you have a static IP address though.
Yes, they did, *twice*, since they wrongly listed my address
18 matches
Mail list logo
