In current kernel 2.6.22-rc3 the frontend module dvb-pll.c is attached as a
generic standard for all bt8xx-based DVB cards. This is no good solution.
Fact is:
The only bt8xx-based card taking advantage of that pll library is the DViCO
FusionHDTV Lite 5. All other bt8xx-based DVB cards do not
Uwe Bugla wrote:
In current kernel 2.6.22-rc3 the frontend module dvb-pll.c is attached as a
generic standard for all bt8xx-based DVB cards. This is no good solution.
Fact is:
The only bt8xx-based card taking advantage of that pll library is the DViCO
FusionHDTV Lite 5. All other
Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2007 20:13 schrieben Sie:
Uwe Bugla wrote:
In current kernel 2.6.22-rc3 the frontend module dvb-pll.c is attached as
a generic standard for all bt8xx-based DVB cards. This is no good
solution.
Fact is:
The only bt8xx-based card taking advantage of that pll library
On 6/1/07, Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2007 20:13 schrieben Sie:
Uwe Bugla wrote:
In current kernel 2.6.22-rc3 the frontend module dvb-pll.c is attached
as
a generic standard for all bt8xx-based DVB cards. This is no good
solution.
Fact is:
The only
Suggestion:
If the patch adds value without breaking anything, include it.
Even if it's ugly, you can easily clean it up later and do it the
right way (tm).
Providing you find time and cleaning it up is more important than
something useful.
I counted about 35 lines of actual logic in the
Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2007 21:42 schrieben Sie:
Suggestion:
If the patch adds value without breaking anything, include it.
Even if it's ugly, you can easily clean it up later and do it the
right way (tm).
Providing you find time and cleaning it up is more important than
something useful.
I
I'll post a better concept patch in a few minutes
-Mike Krufky
Bill Eldridge wrote:
Suggestion:
If the patch adds value without breaking anything, include it.
Even if it's ugly, you can easily clean it up later and do it the
right way (tm).
Providing you find time and cleaning it up is
On 6/1/07, Bill Eldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suggestion:
If the patch adds value without breaking anything, include it.
Even if it's ugly, you can easily clean it up later and do it the
right way (tm).
Providing you find time and cleaning it up is more important than
something
