Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Gregoire Favre wrote:
for some reasons I prefer to use 2.6 kernels, BUT with 2.6 kernels I
can't edit my marks under 2.6...
I have tried to run vdr with only one card: same result...
As already discussed, for some people, it works, for some other it's
Gregoire Favre wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:28:29PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
VDR 1.3 natively supports NPTL.
I am sorry but I don't understand NPTL ;-)
I got same problem with 1.2.x and 1.3.x
If there is a switch to compil without NPTL, I would happily try it!!!
I just
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:23:25PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
What works for me is:
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 ./vdr
Which means that this problem is unrelated to the DVB drivers,
but due to changed behaviour of the new NPTL (native posix
threading library) vs. the old linuxthreads.
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 ./vdr
...
(LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 makes glibc use linuxthreads
even if the kernel is capable of running NPTL.)
VDR 1.3 natively supports NPTL.
What does this mean?
I tried with vdr-1.3.3. It hangs without
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 ./vdr
...
(LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 makes glibc use linuxthreads
even if the kernel is capable of running NPTL.)
VDR 1.3 natively supports NPTL.
What does this mean?
Well, Jon
Gregoire Favre wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:23:25PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
What works for me is:
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 ./vdr
Which means that this problem is unrelated to the DVB drivers,
but due to changed behaviour of the new NPTL (native posix
threading library) vs. the old
