On 7/2/07, Sascha Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 28 June 2007 23:20, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 6/28/07, Sascha Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 14 June 2007 23:05, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Hi,
since I officially take care about the latest
On 6/30/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
timecop wrote:
Hey guys, stop beating dead horses and finding scapegoats.
Whatever excuses you're going to find post-fact isn't going to change
the fact that HE now has working code with functionality better than
the broken crap
CityK wrote:
Oliver Endriss wrote:
timecop wrote:
Hey guys, stop beating dead horses and finding scapegoats.
Whatever excuses you're going to find post-fact isn't going to change
the fact that HE now has working code with functionality better than
the broken crap currently in linux-dvb,
On Thursday 28 June 2007 22:35, Sascha Sommer wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 14 June 2007 23:05, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Hi,
since I officially take care about the latest Empia em28xx code I
want to get that project removed from linuxtv.org.
Mauro already broke some parts in the incomplete
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Well it's solved now, whatever driver will come up in future from my
side I will not submit it to the linuxtv project due the experience I
made during the last 1 1/2 years.
You did a good job with em28xx, but when you tried to force people to
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007, Hans Verkuil wrote:
I've been following this whole process for quite some time now and also
tried to help out. I've come to the conclusion that it is purely due to
bad chemistry between various personalities. Technically this stuff
should have been merged a year ago
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 6/28/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, it is a good idea to have the manufacturer supporting their
drivers. However, it won't make any sense to allow Empiatech to touch on
low-level drivers for hardware not
On 6/29/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 6/28/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, it is a good idea to have the manufacturer supporting their
drivers. However, it won't make any sense to allow
On 6/29/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007, Hans Verkuil wrote:
I've been following this whole process for quite some time now and also
tried to help out. I've come to the conclusion that it is purely due to
bad chemistry between various personalities.
Hey guys, stop beating dead horses and finding scapegoats.
Whatever excuses you're going to find post-fact isn't going to change
the fact that HE now has working code with functionality better than
the broken crap currently in linux-dvb, and YOU don't. Users (what
little of them Linux still has)
timecop wrote:
Hey guys, stop beating dead horses and finding scapegoats.
Whatever excuses you're going to find post-fact isn't going to change
the fact that HE now has working code with functionality better than
the broken crap currently in linux-dvb, and YOU don't. Users (what
little of
Oliver Endriss wrote:
timecop wrote:
Hey guys, stop beating dead horses and finding scapegoats.
Whatever excuses you're going to find post-fact isn't going to change
the fact that HE now has working code with functionality better than
the broken crap currently in linux-dvb, and YOU don't.
Hi Oliver,
Just in case you're not already aware, timecop/dongs/gnaa is a
professional troll. Unfortunately, he's latched onto the project --
he's building some ISDN usb devices and stealing code for them. Also
That would be ISDB-T, not ISDN sir.
And I don't want to be accused of stealing
CityK wrote:
In any regard, its best to just ignore him. He's just trying to get a
rise out of folks here.
Probably you are right. And I will not participate in any flame wars.
If someone is really interested to know what happened, he will hopefully
read all relevant messages and draw his own
On 6/26/07, Roger Depreeuw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Hi,
since I officially take care about the latest Empia em28xx code I want
to get that project removed from linuxtv.org.
Mauro already broke some parts in the incomplete inkernel linux driver.
Since the few
Hi Sascha,
Can someone please summarize these flamewars and especially the remaining
problems?
Please, allow me to give my personal view about this.
Markus tried hardly to force me to commit his big patch as-is, even with
the risk of eventually breaking other other dvb drivers (In fact, it
On 6/28/07, Sascha Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 14 June 2007 23:05, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Hi,
since I officially take care about the latest Empia em28xx code I want
to get that project removed from linuxtv.org.
Mauro already broke some parts in the incomplete
On 6/28/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sascha,
Can someone please summarize these flamewars and especially the remaining
problems?
Please, allow me to give my personal view about this.
Markus tried hardly to force me to commit his big patch as-is, even with
the
Am Donnerstag, den 28.06.2007, 23:28 +0200 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
On 6/28/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sascha,
Can someone please summarize these flamewars and especially the remaining
problems?
Please, allow me to give my personal view about this.
since I officially take care about the latest Empia em28xx code I want
to get that project removed from linuxtv.org.
Mauro already broke some parts in the incomplete inkernel linux driver.
Since the few developers here who cannot just shut their mouth and
accept others work I don't see another way
Previous was corrupted.
since I officially take care about the latest Empia em28xx code I want
to get that project removed from linuxtv.org.
Mauro already broke some parts in the incomplete inkernel linux driver.
Since the few developers here who cannot just shut their mouth and
accept others
Previous 2 mails were corrupted.
since I officially take care about the latest Empia em28xx code I want
to get that project removed from linuxtv.org.
Mauro already broke some parts in the incomplete inkernel linux driver.
Since the few developers here who cannot just shut their mouth and
accept
Sorry, I will removed the quoted message, the message keeps arriving corrupted.
From a user's point of view, the 2 projects (em28xx and linuxtv.org)
have a huge overlapping and common code.
If I wanted to use them both, would I run into a nightmare, or is it
going to be easy?
Will em28xx still be
I wholeheartedly welcome our new EM28XX overlords..
erm I mean, I totally support this decision if it results in better
hardware support.
Regards,
tc
since I officially take care about the latest Empia em28xx code I want
to get that project removed from linuxtv.org.
Mauro already broke some
Hi,
since I officially take care about the latest Empia em28xx code I want
to get that project removed from linuxtv.org.
Mauro already broke some parts in the incomplete inkernel linux driver.
Since the few developers here who cannot just shut their mouth and
accept others work I don't see
25 matches
Mail list logo
