On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:18 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
I plan to test the persistent preallocation patches on a huge sparse
device, to know if 32 bit physical block numbers (upto 48bit) behave as
expected.
Thanks!
I have following questions for this and will appreciate
suggestions here:
Hi,
+ext4_ext_replace_branches(struct inode *org_inode, struct inode *dest_inode,
+ pgoff_t from_page, pgoff_t dest_from_page,
+ pgoff_t count_page, unsigned long *delete_start) +{
+ struct ext4_ext_path *org_path = NULL;
+ struct ext4_ext_path *dest_path = NULL;
+ struct ext4_extent *oext,
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:25:50AM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:18 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
I plan to test the persistent preallocation patches on a huge sparse
device, to know if 32 bit physical block numbers (upto 48bit) behave as
expected.
Thanks!
I have
On Feb 05, 2007 23:09 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:09:40PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. It includes some
cleanups and addition of a creation timestamp. The
EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE flag has also been
On Feb 06, 2007 16:12 +0100, Johann Lombardi wrote:
+ if (sbi-s_inode_size EXT3_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) {
+ EXT3_SB(sb)-s_want_extra_isize = sizeof(struct ext3_inode) -
EXT3_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE;
Maybe EXT3_SB(sb)- could be replaced by sbi- here and in the lines below.
Yes,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:19:50PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
+#define EXT3_INODE_SET_XTIME(xtime, extra_xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
+do { \
+ (raw_inode)-xtime = cpu_to_le32((inode)-xtime.tv_sec); \
+ \
+ if (offsetof(typeof(*raw_inode), extra_xtime) - \
+
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:39 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Feb 06, 2007 16:12 +0100, Johann Lombardi wrote:
+ if (EXT3_SB(sb)-s_want_extra_isize
+ le32_to_cpu(es-s_min_extra_isize))
^^
+
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 13:46:57 -0700
Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 06, 2007 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:12:04 +0100
Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Move the blocks on the temporary inode to the original inode
by a page.
1. Read the
On Feb 07, 2007 16:06 +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:25:50AM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
- disable preallocation if the filesystem free blocks is under some low
watermarks, to save space for near future real block allocation?
A policy decision like this is
