On Tue 29-05-07 14:10:52, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 18:04 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 23-05-07 08:37:43, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:11:27PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
while fixing some problems with preallocation in UDF, I had a look how
ext2
Hi,
The following patch set adds journal checksumming support for linux
kernel and e2fsprogs.
Two new flags have been added i.e
JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ASYNC_COMMIT and JBD2_FEATURE_COMPAT_CHECKSUM.
_CHECKSUM flag indicates that the commit block contains the checksum for
the blocks
Hi,
Patch for adding journal checksums support ext4.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Girish Shilamkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diffstat patches/ext4-journal-chksum-2.6.20.patch
fs/ext4/super.c | 25 ++
fs/jbd2/commit.c| 181
Hi,
This patch has been created on top of the e2fsprogs-1.39-WIP and number
of other patches sent to list. But as it contains changes to recovery
part, should be able to apply safely on top of e2fsprogs-1.39-WIP.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Girish
Hi,
I forgot mention, this patch is spinoff of patch originally written by
Vijayan Prabhakaran.
Thanks Regards.
Girish
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 16:01 +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
Hi,
The following patch set adds journal checksumming support for linux
kernel and e2fsprogs.
Hi Takashi,
I was looking at online defrag code and found that the tmp_inode is
created with tmp_inode-i_nlink equal to zero. Now i am not sure whether
i understand the code correctly, but AFAIU we allocate contiguous block
using this tmp_inode. That means tmp_inode have extent details
On May 30, 2007 12:34 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I haven't tested the defrag code. This came up when i was doing the
online migration. With large file having large number of fragmented
blocks I was getting the below error during the iput of the temporary
inode.
ext4_free_blocks
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 03:06 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
Hi Ted,
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 10:39 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
Hi Kalpak,
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 01:22:32AM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
It will also protect against running e2fsck on a mounted filesystem
by adding similar logic
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:58 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On May 29, 2007 12:44 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
I am a little bit confused about the two patches.
It appears in the ext4_expand_inode_extra_isize patch by Kalpak, there a
new 64 bit i_fs_version field is added to ext4 inode
On Wednesday May 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Jean noel Cordenner wrote:
The aim is to fulfill a NFSv4 requirement for rfc3530:
5.5. Mandatory Attributes - Definitions
Name# DataType Access Description
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:32:57PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:21 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Jean noel Cordenner wrote:
Hi,
This is an update of the i_version patch.
The i_version field is a 64bit counter that is
11 matches
Mail list logo
