Re: [BUG?] ext4_ext_put_in_cache uses __u32 to receive physical block number.

2007-07-27 Thread Mingming Cao
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:16 +0800, Yan Zheng wrote: Hi, all I think I found a bug in ext4/extents.c, ext4_ext_put_in_cache uses __u32 to receive physical block number. ext4_ext_put_in_cache is used in ext4_ext_get_blocks, it sets ext4 inode's extent cache according most recently tree

[BUG?] ext4_ext_put_in_cache uses __u32 to receive physical block number.

2007-07-26 Thread Yan Zheng
Hi, all I think I found a bug in ext4/extents.c, ext4_ext_put_in_cache uses __u32 to receive physical block number. ext4_ext_put_in_cache is used in ext4_ext_get_blocks, it sets ext4 inode's extent cache according most recently tree lookup (higher 16 bits of saved physical block number are