On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:18 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
I plan to test the persistent preallocation patches on a huge sparse
device, to know if 32 bit physical block numbers (upto 48bit) behave as
expected.
Thanks!
I have following questions for this and will appreciate
suggestions here:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:25:50AM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:18 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
I plan to test the persistent preallocation patches on a huge sparse
device, to know if 32 bit physical block numbers (upto 48bit) behave as
expected.
Thanks!
I have
On Feb 07, 2007 16:06 +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:25:50AM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
- disable preallocation if the filesystem free blocks is under some low
watermarks, to save space for near future real block allocation?
A policy decision like this is
I plan to test the persistent preallocation patches on a huge sparse
device, to know if 32 bit physical block numbers (upto 48bit) behave as
expected. I have following questions for this and will appreciate
suggestions here:
a) What should be the sparse device size which I should use for testing?
