Re: e2fsck and human intervention

2007-03-06 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Mar 06, 2007 09:27 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote: OK. Given that write caching may be required for performance reasons or there might be other possible reasons which would result in preen-unrepairable fs corruption on power loss, my question is now: Is it a really bad idea to run e2fsck -y on

e2fsck and human intervention

2007-03-05 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, I'm working with ext3 partitions in a product environment, where numerous embedded Linux systems will be shipped to various locations. In testing we occasionally find that system boot is halted by e2fsck with an UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY error message. This is while running in preen mode.

Re: e2fsck and human intervention

2007-03-05 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Ted, Thanks for the quick response. On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 11:48 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: Actually, power loss by itself should *not* cause any corruption when you are using ext3; that's the whole point of the journal. If there is, you probably have some other problem that you might do