Re: ext4-patch-queue rebased to 2.6.22

2007-07-10 Thread Amit K. Arora
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: On Jul 10, 2007 20:24 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote: On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:37:56PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: So we're just waiting for Amit to make the minor on-disk format change Andreas suggested before we push to

Re: ext4-patch-queue rebased to 2.6.22

2007-07-10 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 10, 2007 23:25 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: It might even make sense to change the other #define to be called EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN so people have to think about this when using the #define. Done. Changes are in ext4 patch

ext4-patch-queue rebased to 2.6.22

2007-07-09 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Per our discussion on the call, I've moved the fallocate patches back up to the front of the queue, and rebased the syscall numbers to 2.6.22. So we're just waiting for Amit to make the minor on-disk format change Andreas suggested before we push to Linus.

Re: ext4-patch-queue rebased to 2.6.22

2007-07-09 Thread Mingming Cao
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 13:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: Per our discussion on the call, I've moved the fallocate patches back up to the front of the queue, and rebased the syscall numbers to 2.6.22. I updated the ext4 patch queue. It seem there is conflict to apply delayed allocation patch,