On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 23:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:55:43 -0800
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, maxblocks, in bitmap_search_next_usable_block(), is the end block
number of the range to search, not the lengh of the range. maxblocks
get passed
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:40 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
After several days of testing ext2 with reservations, it got caught inside
ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv: alloc_new_reservation repeatedly succeeding
on the window [12cff,12d0e], ext2_try_to_allocate repeatedly failing to
find the free
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:41 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
rsv_end is the last block within the reservation,
so alloc_new_reservation should accept start_block == rsv_end as success.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Thanks, Acked.
This is not a problem for now, as the
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:42 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
grp_goal 0 is a genuine goal (unlike -1),
so ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv should treat it as such.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked.
Thanks,
Mingming
---
fs/ext2/balloc.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:44 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
ext2_new_blocks has a nice io_error label for setting -EIO,
so goto that in the one place that doesn't already use it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Acked,
Mingming
fs/ext2/balloc.c |7 +++
1 file
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:43 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
The reservations tree is an rb_tree not a list, so it's less confusing to
use rb_entry() than list_entry() - though they're both just container_of().
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Acked.
Thanks,
Mingming
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:33 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:04:53 -0800
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I have acked most of them, and will port them to ext3/4 soon.
You've acked #2 and #3. #4, #5 and #6 remain un-commented-upon and #1 is
unclear
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 16:50 +0800, guomingyang wrote:
I also find many places where the block number type is not changed in
namei.c and dir.c. Why?
They are all file logical blocks, ext4_fsblk_t is for on disk blocks.
Takashi Sato has a patch to define all file logical blocks as
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 20:07 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:40 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
After several days of testing ext2 with reservations, it got caught inside
ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv: alloc_new_reservation repeatedly
-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
---
linux-2.6.19-rc5-cmm/fs/ext3/balloc.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -puN fs/ext3/balloc.c~ext3_reset_windowsz_in_full_fs fs/ext3/balloc.c
--- linux-2.6.19-rc5/fs/ext3/balloc.c~ext3_reset_windowsz_in_full_fs
2006-11-28 19:36:41.0
for ext3 or ext4? No, because they have an additional
extN_test_allocatable test which rescues them from the error.
--
Sync up a reservation fix from ext2 in ext4
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.19-rc5-cmm/fs/ext4/balloc.c
it as such.
--
Sync up with ext2 reservation fix in ext3
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
---
linux-2.6.19-rc5-cmm/fs/ext3/balloc.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/ext3/balloc.c~ext3-balloc-fix-off-by-one-against-grp_goal
fs/ext3/balloc.c
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 11:53 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
Hi Mingming,
Hi Amit,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 05:28:15PM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 11:28 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
@@ -1142,13 +1155,22 @@
/* try to insert block into found extent and return
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 18:05 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
This is the first patch in the set of two.
It implements the ioctl which will be used for persistent preallocation. It
is a respun of the previous patch which was posted earlier, and includes
following changes:
* Takes care of review
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 16:34 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
Hi Mingming,
And, Looking at other places calling ext4_*_get_blocks() in the kernel,
it seems not all of them protected by i_mutex lock. I think it probably
okay to not holding i_mutex during calling ext4_ext4_get_blocks().
We are
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 14:39 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
This problem was first sighted while stress testing (using modified
fsx-linux stress test) persistent preallocation patches that I posted
earlier. Though I am not able to reproduce this bug (extent overlap)
without the persistent
Alex Tomas wrote:
Mingming Cao (MC) writes:
MC But the bug Amit pointed here is unrelated to the code convert
MC uninitialized blocks to initialized ones. Rather, it's related to do
MC multiple block allocation across on a window with parts already have
MC blocks allocated. Without
Cordenner jean noel wrote:
Andreas Dilger a écrit :
On Jan 23, 2007 18:23 +0100, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
I've updated what was previously the change attribute patch for ext4
initially posted by Alexandre Ratchov. The previous patch was
introducing a change_attribute field, now it uses
coly wrote:
Hi friends:
I can not find the ext4 git tree (on kernel.org) which Te mentioned on
the talk. Can anybody give me a point ? I am new to ext4.
That was the plan discussed a few weeks ago. Ted is travelling (I
think??so he may not get a chance to work on it or annonce it yet.
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:18 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
I plan to test the persistent preallocation patches on a huge sparse
device, to know if 32 bit physical block numbers (upto 48bit) behave as
expected.
Thanks!
I have following questions for this and will appreciate
suggestions here:
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 11:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:09:55 +0100 Andre Noll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:37:22 +0100 Andre Noll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16:18, Andre Noll wrote:
With 2.6.21-rc2
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 15:49 -0700, Avantika Mathur wrote:
Ext4 Developer Interlock Call: 03/14/2007 Meeting Minutes
Attendees: Mingming Cao, Eric Sandeen, Ted Ts'o, Dave Kleikamp, Suparna
Bhattacharya, Takashi Sato, Avantika Mathur
Minutes can be accessed at:
http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:48 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
Ted,
I have rebased the ext4 patchset on 2.6.21-rc4 and cleaned up some bad
whitespace and sparse warnings. The patches are here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/shaggy/ext4/ext4-2007-03-19.tar.bz2
Untarred here:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 19:53 -0700, Avantika Mathur wrote:
Ext4 Developer Interlock Call: 03/21/2007 Meeting Minutes
...
64 bit Inode and Dynamic Inode Table Discussion:
- Though this feature has been discussed for many years; there does not seem
to be high demand currently for 64 bit inode
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 15:43 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds a 32-bit i_version_hi field to ext4_inode, which can be used
for 64-bit inode versions. This field will store the higher 32 bits of the
version, while Jean Noel's patch has added support to store the lower 32-bits
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 13:21 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Apr 04, 2007 19:06 +0200, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
here is the first results of the round:
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20070404/
Jean Noel,
thank you for the test results. It is always nice to see that ext4 is
doing
Ted,
I Just rebased the ext4 patch queue to 2.6.21-rc5,
# Added Reserve high 32 bit for 64 bit inode version
i_version_hi.patch
# Add mount option to turn off extents
ext4_noextent_mount_opt.patch
# Add mount option to turn off delayed allocation
ext4_nodelalloc_mount_opt.patch
And move
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 10:16 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Just a quick note before I forget. I thought there was a call in ext4
to set JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT at mount time if the filesystem has
more than 2^32 blocks?
Question about the online resize case. If the fs is increased to more
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 11:14 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
I've respun the ext4 development patchset, with Amit's updated fallocate
patches. I've added Dave's patch to add ia64 support to the fallocate
system call, but *not* the XFS fallocate support patches. (Probably
better for them to live
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 13:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2007 05:37:54 -0600
Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ block = offset blkbits;
+ max_blocks = (EXT4_BLOCK_ALIGN(len + offset, blkbits)
blkbits)
+- block;
+
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 16:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2007 19:14:42 -0400
Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:38:56PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Actually, this is a non-issue. The reason that it is handled for
extent-only
is that
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 17:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:00:24 -0700
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ while (ret = 0 ret max_blocks) {
+ block = block + ret;
+ max_blocks = max_blocks - ret;
+ ret
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 21:43 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:41:39PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
We could check the total number of fs free blocks account before
preallocation happens, if there isn't enough space left, there is no
need to bother preallocating
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 12:50 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:56:23PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
In any case, it would be useful to add a new set of testsuites for the
new fallocate() syscall and fsstress in LTP testsuites to automatically
the preallocation code in ext4
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 21:31 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
I have the updated patches ready which take care of Andrew's comments.
Will run some tests and post them soon.
But, before submitting these patches, I think it will be better to finalize
on certain things which might be worth some
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 10:37 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On May 09, 2007 10:02 -0700, Avantika Mathur wrote:
Metablock Groups:
- Mingming mentioned that in the metablock group feature, the inode
metadata is not moved with the rest of the metadata. Ted will check
this, as he thought
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:31 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On May 14, 2007 14:21 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On May 14, 2007 13:05 +0200, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
@@ -331,12 +331,13 @@
} osd2; /* OS dependent 2 */
__le16 i_extra_isize;
__le16
Turn on extents feature by default in ext4 filesystem. User could use
-o noextents to turn it off.
Signed-Off-By: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.21.1/fs/ext4/super.c
===
--- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/fs/ext4/super.c 2007
These symbols are used in ext4 only.
Acked-By: Ales Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-Off-By: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.21.1/fs/ext4/extents.c
===
--- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c 2007-05-15 11:52
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 01:07 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
ToDos:
-
1 Implementation on other architectures (other than i386, x86_64,
ppc64 and s390(x)). David Chinner has already posted a patch for ia64.
Here is the 2.6.22-rc1 version of David's patch: add fallocate() on ia64
From: David
. Renamed the ext3
functions to ext4_xxx_xxx().
Compile tested. Can you Ack the changes. Appreciate if you can let me
know it passes your tests.
Signed-Off-By: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc1/fs/ext4/inode.c
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 23:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 19:41:15 +0530 Amit K. Arora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fallocate() is a new system call being proposed here which will allow
applications to preallocate space to any file(s) in a file system.
I merged the first
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 06:49 -0700, Eric wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting strange results when I map out the blocks used in files
larger than a several thousand KB. I never seem to get any more than
1024 contiguous data blocks in a row.
Here's a portion of the output of my script when I run it on a
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:25 +0200, Jean noel Cordenner wrote:
The patch is on top of the ext4 tree:
http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git
In this part, the i_version counter is stored into 2 32bit fields of
the ext4_inode structure osd1.linux1.l_i_version and i_version_hi.
I included
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 18:04 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 23-05-07 08:37:43, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:11:27PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
while fixing some problems with preallocation in UDF, I had a look how
ext2 solves similar problems. I found out that
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:58 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On May 29, 2007 12:44 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
I am a little bit confused about the two patches.
It appears in the ext4_expand_inode_extra_isize patch by Kalpak, there a
new 64 bit i_fs_version field is added to ext4 inode
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 22:57 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 01:08:12 -0600
Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 07, 2007 23:45 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
The jbd2-debug file used to be located in /proc/sys/fs/jbd2-debug, but
create_proc_entry() does not do
Just updated the ext4 patch queue
http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue
Changes:
Added these three patches from Jose Santos:
ext4_set_jbd2_64bit_feature.patch
jbd2_config_jbd2_debug_fix.patch
jbd2_move_jbd2_debug_to_debugfs.patch
Reordered the series, move
jbd-stats-through-procfs and
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 12:02 +0400, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
Variable free was declarated as __u64 so conidition (free 0) always
false, even if free was overflowed during substraction.
Agreed.
Can you add your Signed-off to this patch? I can add mine after yours.
Thanks,
Mingming
---
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 12:14 +0400, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
On 16:16 Птн 15 Июн , Mingming Cao wrote:
I hit almost the same issue today also, but with different error #, and
one more kernel oops, when run fsstress on x86_64.
EXT4-fs: writeback error = -2
EXT4-fs: writeback error
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 11:11 +0400, Alex Tomas wrote:
Mingming Cao wrote:
From the comments it says the page-private is set to 1 to letting
commit_write know that it needs block reservation, but I don't see the
page-private value being checked in ext4_wb_commit_write(). Instead
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 12:15 +0400, Alex Tomas wrote:
Mingming Cao wrote:
Hmm, PageMappedToDisk is probably not sufficient enough for pagesize!
=blocksize. Is that the reason we need page-private to pass the
request?
PageMappedToDisk isn't enough in that case, definitely. bh is the way
http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git
diff --git a/series b/series
index d68345c..766f3eb 100644 (file)
--- a/series
+++ b/series
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Rebased the patches to 2.6.22-rc4
+# Rebased the patches to 2.6.22-rc5
# Add mount option to turn off extents
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 02:55 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Please drop the non-ext4 patches from the ext4 tree and send incremental
patches against the (non-ext4) fallocate patches in -mm.
The ext4 fallocate() patches are dependent on the core fallocate()
patches, so ext4 patch-queue and git
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 13:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Guys, Mike and Sreenivasa at google are looking into implementing
fallocate() on ext2. Of course, any such implementation could and should
also be portable to ext3 and ext4 bitmapped files.
I believe that Sreenivasa will mainly be
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 01:14 -0400, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007 18:26 -0400, Mike Waychison wrote:
Andreas Dilger wrote:
I don't think ext2 is safe for 8TB filesystems anyways, so this
isn't a huge loss.
This is reference to the idea of overloading the high-bit and not
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 13:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:50:04 -0400
Mingming Caoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the ext4 patch queue is in good shape now.
Which ext4 patches are you intending to merge into 2.6.23?
Please send all those out to lkml for review?
Add a mount option to turn off extents.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/super.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/super.c 2007-06-11 17:02:18.0
-0700
+++ linux
Turn on extents feature by default in ext4 filesystem. User could use
-o noextents to turn it off.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/super.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/super.c
Propagate flags such as S_APPEND, S_IMMUTABLE, etc. from i_flags into
ext4-specific i_flags. Hence, when someone sets these flags via a different
interface than ioctl, they are stored correctly.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux
with the patch all headers are checked. the code should become
more resistant to on-disk corruptions. needless BUG_ON() have
been removed. please, review for inclusion.
Signed-off-by: Alex Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4
Set the journals JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT on devices with more
than 32bit block sizes during mount time. This ensure proper record
lenth when writing to the journal.
Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao
When the JBD code was forked to create the new JBD2 code base, the
references to CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG where never changed to
CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG. This patch fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/jbd2/journal.c
This patch adds a 32-bit i_version_hi field to ext4_inode, which can be used
for 64-bit inode versions. This field will store the higher 32 bits of the
version, while Jean Noel's patch has added support to store the lower 32-bits
in osd1.linux1.l_i_version.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL
This patch adds 64-bit inode version support to ext4. The lower 32 bits
are stored in the osd1.linux1.l_i_version field while the high 32 bits
are stored in the i_version_hi field newly created in the ext4_inode.
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL
This patch is on top of i_version_update_vfs.
The i_version field of the inode is set on inode creation and incremented when
the inode is being modified.
Signed-off-by: Jean Noel Cordenner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
Add a noversion mount option to disable inode version updates.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.21/fs/ext4/super.c
===
---
[PATCH] jbd2 stats through procfs
The patch below updates the jbd stats patch to 2.6.20/jbd2.
The initial patch was posted by Alex Tomas in December 2005
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4m=113538565128617w=2).
It provides statistics via procfs such as transaction lifetime and size.
[ This probably
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 17:21:08 2007
Hi,
I have rebased this patch to 2.6.22-rc1 so that it can be added to the
ext4 patch queue. It has been tested by creating more than 65000 subdirs
and then deleting them and checking the nlinks. The e2fsprogs part of
this patch was sent earlier by
Journal checksum feature has been added to detect corruption of journal.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Girish Shilamkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -Nurp linux024/fs/ext4/super.c linux/fs/ext4/super.c
---
Use zero_user_page() in ext4 where possible.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/fs/ext4/inode.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@
Subject: is_power_of_2: ext4/super.c
From: vignesh babu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replace (n (n-1)) in the context of power of 2 checks with is_power_of_2()
Signed-off-by: vignesh babu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dave
Subject: ext4: remove extra IS_RDONLY() check
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ext4_change_inode_journal_flag() is only called from one location:
ext4_ioctl(EXT3_IOC_SETFLAGS). That ioctl case already has a IS_RDONLY()
call in it so this one is superfluous.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen [EMAIL
From: Dmitry Monakhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ext4: extent macros cleanup
- Replace math equation to it's macro equivalent
- make ext4_ext_grow_indepth() indexes/leaf correct
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Alex Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 11:49 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:48:33AM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
Is your concern due to being unable to find contiguous block in the
case that a bad disk area is in one of the bitmap blocks? One thing we
can do is try to search for
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 13:29 -0400, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jun 30, 2007 10:13 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
Another approach we have been thinking is using a backing
inode(per-inode-with-preallocation) to store the preallocated blocks.
When user asked for preallocation on the base inode
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 13:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Per our discussion on the call, I've moved the fallocate patches back up
to the front of the queue, and rebased the syscall numbers to 2.6.22.
I updated the ext4 patch queue.
It seem there is conflict to apply delayed allocation patch,
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:53 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jul 06, 2007 09:51 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
The use of a mount option means the change attribute could be
inconsistent across mounts. If we really need this, wouldn't it make
more sense for it to be a persistent feature of
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 12:40 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 01:30 +0800, coly li wrote:
Hi, once we decide to do this, how about storing inode inside the
directory ?
Which directory?
I think Coly is refering to the idea of
store-inode-inside-in-directory-file.
It's one
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:32 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Set the journals JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT on devices with more
than 32bit block sizes during mount time. This ensure proper record
lenth when writing
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:01 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turn on extents feature by default in ext4 filesystem. User could use
-o noextents to turn it off.
Oh, there you go.
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable
changlog for those patches would
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 21:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:21:49 -0400 Cédric Augonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2007/7/10, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
+ size = sizeof(struct transaction_stats_s);
+ s-stats = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 21:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:19:16 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 18:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:09:40 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 00:38 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:30:25 -0700
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:48 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 07, 2007 23:45 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
The jbd2-debug file
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 23:35 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:35:13PM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
Sorry about this. I was using version 0.04. The latest one I can find
for now is 0.05(searching lkml), but it didn't catch this codling style
bug either. I appreciate
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 22:17 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:09:08 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chinneer pointed that we need to journal the version number
updates together with the operations that causes the change of the inode
version number
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 23:20 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:38:59 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dmitry Monakhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ext4: extent macros cleanup
- Replace math equation to it's macro equivalent
s/it's/its/;)
Okay
/linux/jbd2.h 2007-06-11 16:35:25.0
-0700
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
* CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG is on.
*/
#define JBD_EXPENSIVE_CHECKING
JBD2?
Some cleanups in ext4/JBD2 to follow the naming fules:change micros name
from JBD_XXX to JBD2_XXX.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:22 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the patch all headers are checked. the code should become
more resistant to on-disk corruptions. needless BUG_ON() have
been removed. please, review
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 19:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:38:10 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[PATCH] jbd2 stats through procfs
The patch below updates the jbd stats patch to 2.6.20/jbd2.
The initial patch was posted by Alex Tomas in December 2005
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 21:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:21:49 -0400 Cédric Augonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2007/7/10, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
+ size = sizeof(struct transaction_stats_s);
+ s-stats = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
isize
patch.
Fixing memory allocation issue with expand inode extra isize patch.
- use GFP_NOFS instead of GFP_KERNEL flag for memory allocation
- use kzalloc instead of kmalloc
- fix memory leak in the success case, at the end of while loop.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 18:06 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jul 16, 2007 16:52 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
I am not sure why we need GFP_KERNEL flag here. I think we should use
GFP_NOFS instead. The following patch use the GFP_NOFS flag, as well as
fixing memory leak issue introduced
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable
changlog for those patches would
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:29 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 17:49 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time
-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22/fs/ext4/extents.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c 2007-07-27 08:31:02.0 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22/fs/ext4/extents.c 2007-07-27 08:31:48.0 -0700
@@ -1544,7
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 20:24 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:30:36AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Sigh, we HAVE a patch that was only adding delalloc to ext4, but it
was rejected because that functionality should go into the VFS.
Since the performance improvement
Jean noel Cordenner wrote:
hi,
This patch apply on the top of the ext4 git tree.
It adds a mount option to enable i_version feature for ext4.
I think we should fix overwrite case first. Per lkml discussion, if we
fix the overwrite case by updating the counter in file_update_time() all
the
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:34 +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 17:16 +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
I will make the changes and send an incremental patch.
Hi,
I have made the changes and attached the incremental patch as per the
review.
Thanks,
I merged your
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
