On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:02:11AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
In fact, I just searched for your name, and it pops up in the network
stack, but not in the ext2fs translator (the above files are copyright
Remy Card and Linus Torvald).
I only did a quick look, but I recognized some Linux code
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 01:27:02AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
We have no intention to drop support for it. In fact, we are very
happy with it. How much are we a burden for you? If it helps, we can
probably arrange it so that a volunteer cooperates with you if work is
involved in keeping
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:13:36PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
Indeed some people do use the Hurd and they all do rely on the EXT2_OS_HURD
format support in e2fsprogs. It's the intended plan to migrate away from
EXT2_OS_HURD format and use a strict subset of the ext2 format features
used
Theodore Ts'o, le Sun 12 Aug 2007 17:40:00 -0400, a écrit :
no one touched the ext2 code in two years,
Yes, because the current implementation roughly does its job, so I guess
nobody felt brave enough to touch it. Support for 2GB filesystems was
developped and is used in Debian GNU/Hurd as a
Hi Theodore,
At Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:40:00 -0400,
Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was recent discussion of taking out support for dead OS's and
features in e2fsprogs, such as fragmentation, support for the Masix
OS and Hurd. So in the interests of doing some research to see
At Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:40:00 -0400,
Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is definitely still code in the ext2
filesystem translator which is GPLv2 only, since it is derived from
Linux. And as we all know, GPLv2 and GPLv3 code are licensing
incompatible, and that the FSF has claimed
