Jens Ruehmkorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yup, I'm wrong there, at least when it comes to text processing. When it
comes to some tasks, perl is even slightly faster than C. In some book I
read recently, Kernighan and Wall made some performance comparisons. On
Unix for a text-specific problem,
Jens Ruehmkorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From policy it's perfectly alright to have package names like g+ and
g++. But what to do when using apt-get remove g++? To enforce correct
behaviour of apt-get in all cases (which is *the* package handling tool),
debian would have to restrict the
I'd be interested in the reference.
It was The Practice of Programming [0] by Brian Kernighan and Rob Pike.
[0] http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/tpop/
--
Jens
On 16 Nov 2001, Diane Trout wrote:
Jens Ruehmkorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To get me right, this question was not aiming at a comparison between C
and C++, but why there should be difficulties when porting it ;)
Hmm... I haven't seen too many programs written in C++ get ported too
many
The next FAI release is finished. Also the package fai-kernels has a
new release. The install kernels now support the Promise IDE
diskcontroller. But you have to add the kernel boot parameter
ide0=dc4030. Please note, that the default configuration in FAI is
for potato. For woody, you have to
