ext3 for 2.4

2001-05-17 Thread Andrew Morton
Summary: ext3 works, page_launder() doesn't :) The tree is based on the porting work which Peter Braam did. It's in cvs in Jeff Garzik's home on sourceforge. Info on CVS is at http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=3242 - the module name is `ext3'. There's a README there which describes how

Re: ext3 for 2.4

2001-05-17 Thread Andrew Morton
Andrew Morton wrote: The tree is based on the porting work which Peter Braam did. It's in cvs in Jeff Garzik's home on sourceforge. Info on CVS is at http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=3242 - the module name is `ext3'. That was a bit cryptic. cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL

Re: ext3 for 2.4

2001-05-17 Thread Andrew Morton
Daniel Phillips wrote: And the third is a combination of two patches: ftp://ftp.math.psu.edu/pub/viro/ext2-dir-patch-S4.gz http://nl.linux.org/~phillips/htree/dx.pcache-2.4.4-6 These changes have a very low impact on the journalling code, and vice versa. A few days effort to merge

Re: ext3 for 2.4

2001-05-17 Thread Andreas Dilger
Andrew writes: It's probably worth thinking about adding a fourth journalling mode: `journal=none'. Yes, I had added this (at least in skeleton form) in my ext3 tree. If only I could keep up with you and Daniel for both the ext3 and indexed directory stuff, I might be able to submit it...

Re: ext3 for 2.4

2001-05-17 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Thursday 17 May 2001 17:53, Andrew Morton wrote: It's probably worth thinking about adding a fourth journalling mode: `journal=none'. Roll it all up into a single codebase and call it ext4. Or ext5 (= ext2 + ext3). It rather depends on where the buffercache ends up. ext3 is a client

Re: ext3 for 2.4

2001-05-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
AFAIK the original stated intention of ext3 was cd linux/fs cp -a ext2 ext3 # hack on ext3 That leaves ext2 in ultra-stability, no-patches-unless-absolutely-necessary mode. IMHO prove a new feature, like directories in page cache, journaling, etc. in ext3 first. Then

Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: ext3 for 2.4

2001-05-17 Thread Theodore Tso
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 03:00:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: AFAIK the original stated intention of ext3 was cd linux/fs cp -a ext2 ext3 # hack on ext3 That leaves ext2 in ultra-stability, no-patches-unless-absolutely-necessary mode. IMHO prove a new feature, like

quota tools (was Re: ext3 for 2.4)

2001-05-17 Thread Nathan Scott
hi, On May 17, 9:20pm, Andrew Morton wrote: Subject: ext3 for 2.4 ... - quotas appear to work OK. I'll leave them turned on as I test things, and watch out for oddities. It's hard to find working quota tools. Most of them either don't want to compile and/or don't understand