On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 01:01:27PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On May 08, 2007 16:49 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Andreas Dilger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
One of the important use cases I can see today is the ability to
split the heavily-overloaded e.g. CAP_SYS_ADMIN into much more
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:51:41PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
We will, unfortunately, need to be able to check an entire directory
at once. There's no other efficient way to assure that there are no
duplicate names in a directory, for instance.
I don't see that being a major problem for the
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's a shame that there doesn't seem to be a fine-grained way of
turning on -W's useful bits.
You can turn off -W's undesirable bits. For net/rxrpc/ and fs/afs/ at least,
adding:
CFLAGS += -W -Wno-unused-parameter
to the Makefile generates
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More than one would expect, given that it is recommended in
Documentation/SubmitChecklist, which everyone reads ;)
Which states incorrectly:
| 22: Newly-added code has been compiled with `gcc -W'. This will generate
| lots of noise, but is good for
On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:49:23 +0100 David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following bug was uncovered by compiling with '-W' flag:
gcc -W finds a number of fairly scary bugs.
Do you mean in my code specifically? Or in the kernel in general?
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 08:39:50AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:26:20PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:59:26AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:31:02PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
I have the updated patches ready
On Monday 16 April 2007 18:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:11:30PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
On Thursday 12 April 2007 12:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Once again very strong NACK. Every conditional passing of vfsmounts get
my veto. As mentioned last time
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:46:41AM -0600, Valerie Henson wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:51:41PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
We will, unfortunately, need to be able to check an entire directory
at once. There's no other efficient way to assure that there are no
duplicate names in a
