On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:16:50PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
Well, if you see the modes proposed using above flags :
#define FA_ALLOCATE 0
#define FA_DEALLOCATE FA_FL_DEALLOC
#define FA_RESV_SPACE
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 14:03, Chris Mason wrote:
This patch aims to demonstrate one way to replace buffer heads with a
few extent trees...
Hi Chris,
Quite terse commentary on algorithms and data structures, but I suppose
that is not a problem because Jon has a whole week to reverse engineer
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:58:13PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:16:50PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
Well, if you see the modes proposed using above flags :
#define FA_ALLOCATE 0
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:32 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:38:01 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is on top of the nanosecond timestamp and i_version_hi
patches.
This sort of information isn't needed (or desired) when this patch hits the
git
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable
changlog for those patches would
From: David P. Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revalidate the write permissions for fallocate(2), in case security policy has
changed since the files were opened.
Signed-off-by: David P. Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fs/open.c |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff -uprN -X
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:56:30AM -0400, David Patrick Quigley wrote:
From: David P. Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revalidate the write permissions for fallocate(2), in case security policy has
changed since the files were opened.
Thanks for your patch! Will include it in the patchset.
--
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:58:13PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
Why don't we just merge the interface for preallocation (essentially
enough to satisfy posix_fallocate() and the simple XFS requirement for
space reservation without changing file size), which there is clear agreement
on
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, David Patrick Quigley wrote:
From: David P. Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revalidate the write permissions for fallocate(2), in case security policy has
changed since the files were opened.
Signed-off-by: David P. Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: James Morris [EMAIL
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:58:13PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
Why don't we just merge the interface for preallocation (essentially
enough to satisfy posix_fallocate() and the simple XFS requirement for
space
On Jul 12, 2007 13:56 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
As you suggest, let us just have two modes for the time being:
#define FALLOC_ALLOCATE 0x1
#define FALLOC_ALLOCATE_KEEP_SIZE 0x2
As the name suggests, when FALLOC_ALLOCATE_KEEP_SIZE mode is passed it
will result
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:44:21 EDT, Ric Wheeler said:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:39:41 EDT, Ric Wheeler said:
All of the high end arrays have non-volatile cache (read, on power loss,
it is a
promise that it will get all of your data out to permanent storage). You
} -Original Message-
} From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid-
} [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
} Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:35 PM
} To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
} Cc: Tejun Heo; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stefan Bader; Phillip Susi; device-mapper
} development;
Kalpak Shah wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable
changlog for
14 matches
Mail list logo
