On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 04:13:10AM -0700, Daniel Phillips ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 01:46, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 06:04:06AM -0700, Daniel Phillips
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Perhaps you never worried about the resources that the device
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 05:46, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
The throttling of the virtual device must begin in
generic_make_request and last to -endio. You release the throttle
of the virtual device at the point you remap the bio to an
underlying device, which you have convinced yourself is
--- David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Casey Schaufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Smack you can leave the label alone, raise CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE,
do your business of setting the label correctly, and then drop
the capability. No new hooks required.
That sounds like a
On Aug 14 2007 20:29, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
I'm pleased to announce second release of the distributed storage
subsystem, which allows to form a storage on top of remote and local
nodes, which in turn can be exported to another storage as a node to
form tree-like storages.
I'll be quick: what
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I'm pleased to announce second release of the distributed storage
subsystem, which allows to form a storage on top of remote and local
nodes, which in turn can be exported to another storage as a node to
form
Casey Schaufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoops, sorry. You leave the process label alone and explicitly
set the file label using the xattr interfaces.
That's the wrong way to do things. There'd then be a window in which
cachefilesd (the userspace daemon) could attempt to view the file when
