On Friday 18 January 2008, Chris mason wrote:
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Christian Hesse wrote:
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Chris mason wrote:
So, I've put v0.11 out there.
Ok, back to the suspend problem I mentioned:
[ oopsen ]
I get this after a suspend/resume cycle with
2008/1/21, Christian Hesse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Back in early december I reported the problem for btrfs 0.9. Seems like the
lockfs call still is not implemented. Any hints what I need when I try to
code it myself?
Please try this dirty patch. I think it can solve your problem.
Regards
YZ
---
On Monday 21 January 2008, Yan Zheng wrote:
2008/1/21, Christian Hesse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Back in early december I reported the problem for btrfs 0.9. Seems like
the lockfs call still is not implemented. Any hints what I need when I
try to code it myself?
Please try this dirty patch. I
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Chris mason wrote:
So, I've put v0.11 out there.
Ok, back to the suspend problem I mentioned:
Jan 18 00:04:40 revo WARNING: at fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c:74 defrag_walk_down()
Jan 18 00:04:40 revo Pid: 258, comm: btrfs/0 Not tainted 2.6.24-rc8 #1
Jan 18 00:04:40 revo
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Christian Hesse wrote:
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Chris mason wrote:
So, I've put v0.11 out there.
Ok, back to the suspend problem I mentioned:
[ oopsen ]
I get this after a suspend/resume cycle with mounted btrfs.
Looks like metadata corruption. How are
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/
Well, it turns out this release had a few small problems:
* data=ordered deadlock on older kernels (including 2.6.23)
* Compile problems when
On Jan 17, 2008 1:25 PM, Chris mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I've put v0.11 out there. It fixes those two problems and will also
compile on older (2.6.18) enterprise kernels.
v0.11 does not have any disk format changes.
Hi Chris,
First, massive congratulations for bringing this to
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 1:25 PM, Chris mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I've put v0.11 out there. It fixes those two problems and will also
compile on older (2.6.18) enterprise kernels.
v0.11 does not have any disk format changes.
Hi Chris,
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
It does not even compile for me, tested with 2.6.24-rc{7,8}. I will look at
that later.
fs/built-in.o: In function `btrfs_xattr_set_acl':
acl.c:(.text+0x68f33): undefined reference
ons, 16 01 2008 kl. 11:02 +0100, skrev Christian Hesse:
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
It does not even compile for me, tested with 2.6.24-rc{7,8}. I will look at
that later.
fs/built-in.o: In function
10 matches
Mail list logo
