On Fri, 15 June 2007 12:37:32 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:38:46PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually
> > seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of
> > c
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:38:46PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually
> seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of
> code at once. An I thought I was the only wimp around.
>
> Again, anyon
On Mon, 4 June 2007 00:18:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 03 June 2007, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> > Unchanged:
> > o error handling
> >
> ...
> > Won't happen (unless I get convinced to do otherwise):
> > o Change LOGFS_BUG() and LOGFS_BUG_ON() to inline functions
> > These are macros fo
On Sunday 03 June 2007, Jörn Engel wrote:
> Unchanged:
> o error handling
>
...
> Won't happen (unless I get convinced to do otherwise):
> o Change LOGFS_BUG() and LOGFS_BUG_ON() to inline functions
> These are macros for very much the same reasons BUG() and BUG_ON() are.
I wonder how many of
On Sun, 2007-06-03 20:38:46 +0200, Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually
> seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of
> code at once. An I thought I was the only wimp around.
Though it would be nice
On Sun, 3 June 2007 21:17:44 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-03 20:38:46 +0200, Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually
> > seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of
> > code at onc
This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually
seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of
code at once. An I thought I was the only wimp around.
Again, anyone giving comments in the last round is on Cc:.
I'll try to respond to comments but the ne
