On Thu 07-02-08 08:06:37, Rasmus Rohde wrote:
Ok - I have checked get_parent and it works as expected.
I used the Neil Brown-test mentioned elsewhere in this thread and
added a few printk's to make sure we actually got the code covered.
There's still a few trivial warnings from
Maybe sysctls just need to check capabilities, instead of uids. I
think that would make a lot of sense anyway.
Would it be as simple as tagging the inodes with capability sets? One
set for writing, or one each for reading and writing?
Yes, or something even simpler, like
Quoting Miklos Szeredi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Maybe sysctls just need to check capabilities, instead of uids. I
think that would make a lot of sense anyway.
Would it be as simple as tagging the inodes with capability sets? One
set for writing, or one each for reading and writing?
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:58:59AM -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Jan 18, 2008, at 6:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 02:41:57PM -0800, Marc Eshel wrote:
The problem seems to be with the fact that the client and server are
on
the same machine. This test work fine
Before posting the last and hopefully final patch I'd like to know what
Jan says about open coding the lookup for ..
It will mean a lot of code duplication and I think it makes good sense
for udf_find_entry to be able to handle ..
Yes, I think opencoding it would really lead to larger
On Feb 7, 2008 12:25 PM, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:43:01AM -0600, Steve French wrote:
I only remember missing a loop unwinding on exit style comment of
yours that was not addressed in what got integrated. I will go back
through your notes again
Quoting Miklos Szeredi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Maybe sysctls just need to check capabilities, instead of uids. I
think that would make a lot of sense anyway.
Would it be as simple as tagging the inodes with capability sets? One
set for writing, or one each for reading and
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:08:58PM +0200, Rabeeh Khoury wrote:
Exporting an XFS volume with kernel NFSD when real-time subvolume is
enabled hangs the kernel.
I'm using vanilla LK 2.6.22.7; first I create the XFS volume with
two
partitions of 20GB each with extent size of 1MB;
On Feb 7, 2008 12:25 PM, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and while I'm at it a lot of the non-DFS additions to cifs aren't quite
up to standards for kernel code either, lots of useless braces, wierd
coding style and ifdef mania.
Reducing ifdef mania would help (there are about 120
