Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-17 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 17:49 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time) +{ + return

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-17 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:29 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 17:49 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +static inline __le32

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-16 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable changlog for those patches would

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-13 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: Kalpak Shah wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what the

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-13 Thread Mingming Cao
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:35 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: Kalpak Shah wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is a

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-12 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable changlog for those patches would

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-12 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Kalpak Shah wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable changlog for

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-11 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 10, 2007 22:00 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what the old nanosecond patches

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-11 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 10, 2007 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: +#define EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(ext4_inode, einode, field) \ + ((offsetof(typeof(*ext4_inode), field) +\ + sizeof((ext4_inode)-field)) \ + = (EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + \ +

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable changlog for those patches would do in a pinch. Preferable would be to write a proper

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-10 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable changlog for those patches would

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-04 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: + +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \ +do { \ +

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-04 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: + +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \ +do { \

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-04 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: + +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \ +do { \ +

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-04 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 04, 2007 12:06 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: + +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \ +do {

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-03 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Mingming Cao wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. It includes some cleanups and addition of a creation timestamp. The EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE flag has also been added along with s Should be EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE -aneesh - To unsubscribe from

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-03 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: + +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \ +do {\ + (inode)-xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)-xtime);

[EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-01 Thread Mingming Cao
This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. It includes some cleanups and addition of a creation timestamp. The EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE flag has also been added along with s_{min, want}_extra_isize fields in struct ext3_super_block. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL